ArticleInternational journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine2022
Assessing and addressing barriers towards MDI use in acute asthma exacerbations at a tertiary pediatric ED in the United Arab Emirates.
Article in International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is one of the most common causes of emergency department (ED) visits in children. Therapy delivered through a meter dose inhaler with spacer (MDI + S) is equally as effective as nebulization in mild and moderate asthma exacerbations but was not routinely prescribed in the ED at the largest tertiary center for pediatrics in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Phase 1 of this cohort study involved a validated survey to evaluate physicians' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards MDI therapy. While 62% of physicians reported that MDI + S was equally effective as nebulizers and 82% believed that they had sufficient knowledge with regard to its use, only 28% prescribed it. Perceived barriers to change of practice included: Lack of clinical practice guidelines (CPG), poor knowledge amongst nurses and physicians, caregivers' reluctance and a difficult prescription process. Phase 2 consisted of administering the same survey after completing interventions to address the aforementioned barriers. Comparisons were made between the subgroups within phase 1 and statistically significant differences were noted with a p value < .05. The number of physicians who prescribed MDI + S increased from 28% to 41% (p value = .046). Moreover, physicians who believed that convincing parents to use MDI + S therapy would be easy, increased from 35% to 66% (p value < .0001). In conclusion, more physicians reported prescribing MDI + S in Phase 2 while concerns about barriers that exist to change in practice remained similar in both phases showing that consistent and prolonged advocacy is required to achieve long-term compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.