Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572913›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Does needle-type increase the diagnostic yield of malignancies in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)?-a prospective comparative study.

Piotr Skrzypczak, Łukasz Gąsiorowski, Magdalena Sielewicz, Magdalena Roszak, Mikołaj Kamiński, Cezary Piwkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Transbronchial needle core biopsyEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evolution of transbronchial needle aspiration needles: Over the last half century.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piotr Skrzypczak *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Łukasz Gąsiorowski *Department of Medical Simulation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Magdalena SielewiczDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Magdalena RoszakDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Mikołaj KamińskiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Cezary PiwkowskiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a commonly performed minimally invasive technique for diagnosing mediastinal pathologies. Currently, many needle types are being developed to improve the accuracy of the final diagnosis. Our study aimed to assess the possible advantages and disadvantages between the 22-gauge ProCore Methods: In this prospective study, we enrolled a group of 363 EBUS-TBNA patients. For each patient, we used either the ProCore Results: By using EBUS-TBNA, a diagnosis was established in 306 patients (84.3%). The rates of the final diagnoses in ProCore Conclusions: Both types of needles demonstrated very high diagnostic efficiency for malignancy, and there was no significant advantage of the ProCore

Indexed as

endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)endoscopyLung cancerminimally invasive techniques

Identifiers

PMID35572913
PMCPMC9096298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.