Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572870›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Patient-completed Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and its implementation in patient education.

Bo Peng, Lin Sun, Yan Shang, Yajuan Zhang, Xiwen Gao, Ling Ye, Meiling Jin, Wei He, Zhijun Jie, Chunling Du and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Bo Peng *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin Sun *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan Shang *Department of General Practice, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Yajuan ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiwen GaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ling YeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Meiling JinDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei HeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhijun JieDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chunling DuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, People's Hospital of Shanghai Qingpu District, Shanghai, China.
Lei ZhouDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, People's Hospital of Shanghai Qingpu District, Shanghai, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolian SongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Juan DuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fengying ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yi GongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuheng ShiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wuping BaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Haihua ChenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shibei Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jin WangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shibei Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chijun WenDepartment of Asthma, Huangpu Branch, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Weihao LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Jing'an District Centre Hospital of Shanghai, China.
Dandan ZhaoMedical Affair of Joincare Pharmaceutical Group Industry Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei TangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poor control of asthma results from many factors, partly due to inadequate knowledge towards asthma among patients. It is necessary to know patients' knowledge level before education. However, there is no accepted instrument to evaluate knowledge of asthma in Chinese patients with asthma. The study aims to develop a Chinese version of Patient-completed Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire (PAKQ) to assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness for testing its clinical application in Chinese adult patients with asthma. Methods: After translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation of the PAKQ into Chinese version, a survey of patients with asthma (n=464) in China was conducted. Demographics and clinical data were collected in addition to questionnaires concerning cognition of asthma, education, history, and asthma control test score. The PAKQ was then completed. 14±4 days after the initial assessment, the participants completed the retested questionnaire and again completed the questionnaire immediately after education. The reliability and the construct validity were evaluated. The optimal cut-off points for predicting disease knowledge among asthma patients were determined using the Youden index method. Results: The Chinese version of PAKQ showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha =0.888) at baseline and an acceptable 2-week test-retest reliability (ICC =0.932, r=0.874). On the basis of large modification indices (>10), this four-factor questionnaire was found to fit the data satisfactorily (χ Conclusions: The Chinese version of the PAKQ questionnaire was developed and validated in terms of reliability and validity as an effective instrument for the insight into asthma knowledge of adult patients with asthma in China. Future research will evaluate the utility of the instrument in clinical practice.

Indexed as

asthma knowledgeChinese localizationPatient-completed Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire (PAKQ)reliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID35572870
PMCPMC9096276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.