ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Effect of prior cancer history on survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma: a propensity score matching, population-based study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of prior cancer history on survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a retrospective cohort study using SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Prior Cancer and Survival in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Clinical characterization and prognostic modeling of bladder cancer patients with a history of prior tumors: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Comparison of lymph node metastasis pattern from esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma versus very low thoracic esophageal squamous cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When conducting esophageal cancer clinical trials, prior cancer history is frequently considered an exclusion criterion due to the assumption that prior malignancy may exert significant interference with the prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of prior cancer on survival of patients with esophageal cancer and provide valuable assistance for trial design. Methods: Data regarding patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2011 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of prior cancer history. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the confounding bias caused by covariates. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare all-cause and esophageal cancer-specific survival between patients with and without prior cancer. Results: Among 17,123 patients with esophageal carcinoma included in this study, 2,224 (13%) patients had prior cancer history. Before PSM, Kaplan-Meier curves between the two groups classified by prior cancer history showed no significant differences in all-cause (HR =1.047, 95% CI: 0.995-1.102, P=0.077) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (HR =0.986, 95% CI: 0.928-1.048, P=0.65). Similar results were obtained after PSM. In multivariate Cox analysis, prior malignancy was not significantly associated with all-cause (HR =1.002, 95% CI: 0.936-1.072, P=0.965) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (HR =0.964, 95% CI: 0.890-1.045, P=0.374). Subgroup analysis stratified by timing of prior cancer demonstrated that prior cancer had no significant effect on prognosis in the recent latency period subgroups (P>0.05). Furthermore, patients with a prior cancer of lung and bronchus (P=0.013) or head and neck (P=0.012) displayed significantly worse survival than patients without prior cancer, while other types of prior cancer showed no significant effect. Conclusions: The findings suggest that prior cancer is likely not a definite factor that has an impact on all-cause and esophageal cancer-specific survival. Therefore, exclusion criteria of prior cancer history in esophageal cancer clinical trials should be seriously reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.