Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572852›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2022

Sex-specific vulnerability to depressive symptoms across adolescence and during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of the cingulum bundle.

Rajpreet Chahal, Tiffany C Ho, Jonas G Miller, Lauren R Borchers, Ian H Gotlib

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajpreet ChahalDepartment of Psychology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-5622
Tiffany C HoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science Weil Institute for Neuroscience University of California San Francisco California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4500-6364
Jonas G MillerDepartment of Psychology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-3900
Lauren R BorchersDepartment of Psychology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-6239
Ian H GotlibDepartment of Psychology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3622-3199
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Association Between Early Life Stress and Depression Across AdolescenceR37MH101495 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB · 2018 to 2026
$6.6M
The Roles of Inflammatory and Glutamatergic Processes in the Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms Underlying Adolescent DepressionK01MH117442 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HO, TIFFANY CHEING · 2018 to 2022
$881k
The Effects of Early Life Stress on the Development of Brain Networks: Predicting Risk for Depression and Suicidal Ideation in AdolescenceF32MH120975 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHAHAL, RAJPREET · 2020 to 2022
$126k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH120975NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH117442NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH101495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Females are at higher risk for developing depression during adolescence than are males, particularly during exposure to stressors like the COVID-19 pandemic. Examining structural connections between brain regions involved in executive functioning may advance our understanding of sex biases in stress and depression. Here, we examined the role of the cingulum bundle in differentiating trajectories of depressive symptoms in males and females across adolescence and during the pandemic. Methods: In a longitudinal study of 214 youth (121 females; ages 9-13 years at baseline), we examined whether fixel-based properties of the cingulum bundle at baseline predict changes in females' and males' severity of depressive symptoms across four timepoints (4-7 years) in adolescence, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also tested whether cingulum properties predict self-reported resilience and stress during the pandemic. Results: Females had lower fiber density and cross-section (FDC) of the cingulum than did males, a neural pattern that predicted greater increases in depressive symptoms, lower resilience, and higher stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cingulum morphometry predicted changes in depressive trajectories in females, but not in males; specifically, females with lower FDC had significant increases in symptoms throughout adolescence, whereas females with higher cingulum FDC did not. Conversely, males had low, stable depressive symptoms throughout adolescence and higher resilience and lower stress during the pandemic compared to females. Higher cingulum FDC predicted higher resilience and lower stress in both sexes. Conclusions: In adults, the cingulum has been implicated in sex differences in stress reactivity. We show that in adolescents, the cingulum reflects sex differences in reports of stress and resilience that might contribute to the increased risk of stress-related mood disorders in females. Adolescent females might benefit from cognitive interventions that strengthen the structural properties of the cingulum and increase their perceived resilience during periods of adversity and disruption.

Indexed as

adolescencecingulumCOVID‐19depressionresiliencesex differences

Identifiers

PMID35572852
PMCPMC9088357
OpenAlexW4213425122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.