ArticleGalen medical journal2021
Mortality Rate of Sepsis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The Prognostic Role of Ejection Fraction and Procalcitonin.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is the second leading cause of death in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is one of the important causes of death for all hospitalized patients [1]. Evidence revealed procalcitonin as the critical risk factor for determining the prognosis of septic patients [2,3].Also, new studies indicated that diastolic dysfunction and low ejection fraction (EF) were identified as risk factors for death in septic patients [4]. Indeed, septic patients with lower EF had higher mortality rates than other septic patients [5]. Hence, in the pilot study, we determine the mortality rate of hospitalized patients in our clinic during 2020. Besides, EF was evaluated via echocardiography, and also serum PCT was measured on the first day of admission to ICU. Our results indicate that 35 % and 65 % of patients were expired and discharged, respectively. The association between EF and mortality is shown in Figure-1. There were no significant differences between EF and mortally among studied patients (P=0.79). The mean PCT in expired patients was 7.67 ±5.52 ng/ml, while in the discharged patients was 4.21±3.1 ng/ml. On the other hand, although the mean PCT level in the expired patients was higher than those discharged, this difference was not significant. Our study revealed that although PCT and EF statistically were not different in expired patients compared to those discharged, both PCT and EF could be considered important prognostic factors for mortality among sepsis patients in the ICU. However, more studies with larger sample sizes and more parameters for the determination of EF and PCT are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.