Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572825›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Kunpeng Zhang, Yan Gao, Junwei Lv, Jian Li, Jingli Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kunpeng ZhangDepartment of Catheterization Room, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7263-960X
Yan GaoDepartment of Computer Tomography Room, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2336-1269
Junwei LvDepartment of Computer Tomography Room, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-0195
Jian LiDepartment of Computer Tomography Room, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6182-1318
Jingli LiuDepartment of Catheterization Room, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, 264000 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-0378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical application effect of spiral computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction based on artificial intelligence in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a CT 3D reconstruction model based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) was established in this research, which was compared with the model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and used in clinical practice. Then, 62 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVI surgery were recruited as the research objects. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the multislice spiral CT scan (MSCT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in predicting the type of TAVI surgical valve were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) (0.01) and root mean square error (RMSE) (0.086) of the MBIR model were higher than the reconstruction model in this research. The structural similarity (SSIM) (0.831) and peak signal-to noise ratio (PSNR) (32.77 dB) of the MBIR model were lower than the reconstruction model, and the differences were considerable (

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveArtificial IntelligenceCardiac CatheterizationHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, Spiral Computed

Identifiers

PMID35572825
PMCPMC9095377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.