Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572816›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2022

Repeatability of Ultrasound-Defined Bladder Shape Metrics in Healthy Volunteers.

Kaitlyn M Maddra, Rui Li, Anna S Nagle, Adam P Klausner, John E Speich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaitlyn M MaddraDepartment of Surgery/Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Rui LiDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University College of Engineering, Richmond, VA, USA.
Anna S NagleDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University College of Engineering, Richmond, VA, USA.
Adam P KlausnerDepartment of Surgery/Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
John E SpeichDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University College of Engineering, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-4098

Funding

The Detrusor Tension Sensor: A Model for Novel Cystometrics in Overactive BladderR01DK101719 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KLAUSNER, ADAM PHILIP, SPEICH, JOHN E · 2015 to 2023
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK101719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies demonstrate the potential value of using non-invasive abdominal ultrasound to quantify bladder shape and its association with disorders of bladder filling and voiding. The aim of the present study was to assess the repeatability of ultrasound-defined bladder shape metrics within the same individual from multiple bladder fills and study visits. Patients and Methods: Healthy volunteers completed an oral hydration protocol with two weekly visits, each with two consecutive bladder fill-void cycles, providing four total fills per participant. Throughout filling, 3-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound images were recorded at 5-minute intervals. Perimeters were manually traced in six cross-sectional planes 30° apart using GE 4D-View software. Diameters, perimeters and cross-sectional areas for the transverse, sagittal and coronal planes were interpolated at three standard bladder volumes of 200, 300, and 400mL. To quantify repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and normalized mean absolute differences were calculated for each metric at each standard volume. Moderate and good repeatability were defined as ICC ≥0.5 and ICC ≥0.75, respectively. Results: Data from 16 healthy volunteers (9 females, 7 males) were analyzed. ICCs for the transverse vertical and horizontal diameters showed good repeatability, and five of nine perimeter ICCs showed moderate or good repeatability. The mean absolute difference/mean ratio was ≤4% for all perimeter measurements, indicating repeatability was consistent for multiple fills and visits. Conclusion: Initial evidence indicates that bladder shape metrics are relatively repeatable and therefore feasible to pursue as a non-invasive tool for potential evaluation of bladder function.

Indexed as

non-invasiveoveractive bladderultrasound imagingurinary bladder

Identifiers

PMID35572816
PMCPMC9091689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.