Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Variation of Soil Microbial Community and Sterilization to

Xue Wu, Cuinan Wu, Daipeng Lu, Yiwen Wu, Zhangying Ye, Liru Xia, Yudong Sun, Encai Bao, Lin Ye, Yuxin Tang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xue WuThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Cuinan WuThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Daipeng LuThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Yiwen WuThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Zhangying YeSchool of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Liru XiaThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Yudong SunJiangsu Xuhuai Region Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Science, Huai'an, China.
Encai BaoThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Lin YeAgriculture College, Ningxia University, Yingchuan, China.
Yuxin TangThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Kai CaoThe Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNingxia University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is critical to exploit technologies for alleviating watermelon continuous cropping obstacle which frequently occurs and results in the limiting production and economic losses of watermelon. This study aimed to explore the effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) on watermelon continuous cropping obstacles. The results showed that SAEW significantly improved the growth of watermelon seedlings cultivated in continuous cropping soil and caused a mass of changes to the diversity of the soil microbial community. Compared with Con, SAEW decreased the diversity index of bacteria by 2%, 0.48%, and 3.16%, while it increased the diversity index of fungus by 5.68%, 10.78%, and 7.54% in Shannon, Chao1, and ACE index, respectively. Besides, the enrichment level of

Indexed as

continuous cropping obstacleFusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveumslightly acidic electrolyzed watersoil microbial diversitywatermelon

Identifiers

PMID35572699
PMCPMC9097028
OpenAlexW4224988057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.