Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Health Benefits and Participation Barriers of Different Level Horseback Riders Age-Wise.

Iker Sáez, Patxi León-Guereño, Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, Eneko Balerdi, Xabier Río, Beñat Lavín, Josu Solabarrieta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iker SáezDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Patxi León-GuereñoDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Ewa Malchrowicz-MośkoFaculty of Sport Sciences, Eugeniusz Piasecki University of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland.
Eneko BalerdiDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Xabier RíoDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Beñat LavínDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Josu SolabarrietaDepartment of Educational Innovation and Organization, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although horseback riding is not specifically mentioned in the recommendations for different age groups regarding the level of physical activity necessary for good health, its practice continues to grow in popularity throughout the world. Despite being a minority discipline, it has some characteristics that make it an opportunity for its participants to be active people, so it is important to understand what are the perceived health benefits and barriers to participation. The aim of the study is to describe and analyze the perceived health benefits and barriers in horseback riding among riders categorized by level and age, in order to promote physical activity through these benefits and to overcome the barriers. An online version of the EBBS (Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale) was used to analyze benefits and barriers. The sample consisted of 2,651 participants (95.9% women and 4.1% men) in an equestrian event, distributed in four age groups (79.4% up to 25 years, 11.5% between 26 and 35, 7.9% between 36 and 50, and 1.2 older than 50 years). Perceived benefits and participation barriers to horseback riding were analyzed. The factor analysis identified and confirmed five benefit factors and four barrier factors. Benefit factors were significantly correlated among them but barriers were less interrelated. Higher ages were associated to larger benefits and less barrier effects. Benefit and barrier differences were larger between amateur and professional riders, compared to gender differences.

Indexed as

barriershealth benefitshorseback ridingperceived benefits and barriersphysical activityphysical inactivity

Identifiers

PMID35572291
PMCPMC9097916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.