Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35572164›Full record

Trial reportOccupational therapy international2022

Effectiveness of Repetitive Facilitative Exercise Combined with Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Improve Very Severe Paretic Upper Limbs in with Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hitoshi Ohnishi, Hiroyuki Miyasaka, Naoki Shindo, Kazuki Ito, Shiori Tsuji, Shigeru Sonoda

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Occupational therapy international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hitoshi OhnishiFujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial Hospital, 424-1, Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1295, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-0961
Hiroyuki MiyasakaFujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial Hospital, 424-1, Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1295, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9858-5809
Naoki ShindoFujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial Hospital, 424-1, Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1295, Japan.
Kazuki ItoFujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial Hospital, 424-1, Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1295, Japan.
Shiori TsujiFujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial Hospital, 424-1, Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1295, Japan.
Shigeru SonodaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine II, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, 424-1, Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1295, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-5308
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPFujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The difference in the effects of combined therapy with repetitive facilitative exercise (RFE) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on stroke upper limb paralysis was only reported by a pilot study; it has not been investigated in many patients. Objective: We investigated the effect of combined therapy with RFE and NMES on stroke patients with severe upper paresis. Methods: This study included 99 of the very severe paresis stroke patients with scores of zero or 1a in the Finger-Function test of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). We randomly divided the patients into four groups, namely, NMES, RFE, RFE under NMES, and conventional training (CT) groups. A total of 20 min of group-specific training in addition to 40 min of conventional exercise per day, seven times a week for 4 weeks after admission, was performed. The upper extremity items of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) were evaluated before and after the training period. Results: The total score gains of the FMA, FMA wrist item, and FMA finger item were significantly larger in the RFE under NMES group than those in the CT group ( Conclusion: The combination of voluntary movement and electrical stimulation may promote the activation of paralyzed muscles and improve distal function for very severe paralyzed upper limbs.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyOccupational TherapyStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansParesisPilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID35572164
PMCPMC9068343
OpenAlexW4225005241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.