Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571994›Full record

ArticleReading and writing2023

Relation between digital tool practices in the language arts classroom and reading comprehension scores.

Ladislao Salmerón, Cristina Vargas, Pablo Delgado, Naomi Baron

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reading and writing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reading Format Attitudes in the Time of COVID.Journal of academic librarianship · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ladislao SalmerónERI Lectura, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4283-4279
Cristina VargasERI Lectura, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Pablo DelgadoERI Lectura, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Naomi BaronDepartment of World Languages and Cultures, American University, Washington, USA.
Universitat de València · ESAmerican University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about the negative effects of digitalization on students' reading comprehension, empirically backed by recent meta-analyses, question the efficacy of digital tools in the language arts classroom. By analyzing data from 4 and 8th grade US students from NAEP 2017, we aimed to test the generalization of the negative association between screens use and reading comprehension test scores within language arts classrooms, and to identify teachers' practices to support comprehension, which could reduce such a negative relationship. We used data from 149,400 4th grade and 144,900 8th grade students to predict their reading comprehension scores based on their frequency of use of digital devices in the language arts class, as well as on the specific learning activities performed with such devices. Results revealed that amount of daily use of digital devices was negatively related to scores on a reading comprehension test. In addition, teachers' uses of digital tools to support students' reading comprehension showed positive relations for student use of digital devices for reading projects, and negative relations for activities addressing specific reading skills, such as building and practicing vocabulary. We discuss these results in light of our current understanding of the effects of digitalization on reading.

Indexed as

Digital devicesNAEPReading comprehensionTeachers’ practices

Identifiers

PMID35571994
PMCPMC9076497
OpenAlexW4229016136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.