Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571767›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Aqueous Solubility Prediction.

Gihan Panapitiya, Michael Girard, Aaron Hollas, Jonathan Sepulveda, Vijayakumar Murugesan, Wei Wang, Emily Saldanha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gihan PanapitiyaPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-7600
Michael GirardPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Aaron HollasPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Jonathan SepulvedaPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Vijayakumar MurugesanPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-1702
Wei WangPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-4695
Emily SaldanhaPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the aqueous solubility of molecules is a vital step in many pharmaceutical, environmental, and energy storage applications. Despite efforts made over decades, there are still challenges associated with developing a solubility prediction model with satisfactory accuracy for many of these applications. The goals of this study are to assess current deep learning methods for solubility prediction, develop a general model capable of predicting the solubility of a broad range of organic molecules, and to understand the impact of data properties, molecular representation, and modeling architecture on predictive performance. Using the largest currently available solubility data set, we implement deep learning-based models to predict solubility from the molecular structure and explore several different molecular representations including molecular descriptors, simplified molecular-input line-entry system strings, molecular graphs, and three-dimensional atomic coordinates using four different neural network architectures-fully connected neural networks, recurrent neural networks, graph neural networks (GNNs), and SchNet. We find that models using molecular descriptors achieve the best performance, with GNN models also achieving good performance. We perform extensive error analysis to understand the molecular properties that influence model performance, perform feature analysis to understand which information about the molecular structure is most valuable for prediction, and perform a transfer learning and data size study to understand the impact of data availability on model performance.

Identifiers

PMID35571767
PMCPMC9096921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.