Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571737›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Perception of Individuals with Diabetes about Efficacy and Safety of Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) in the Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulkarim M Meraya, Waquar Ahsan, Mohammed Albratty, Hassan A Alhazmi, Asim Najmi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of knowledge and awareness about ovarian cancer and its risk factors among women in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdulkarim M MerayaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, P. O Box No. 114, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-7270
Waquar AhsanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, P. O Box No. 114, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5987-2933
Mohammed AlbrattyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, P. O Box No. 114, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-0573
Hassan A AlhazmiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, P. O Box No. 114, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-9006
Asim NajmiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, P. O Box No. 114, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-5523
Jazan University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CAM is widely accepted for the management of diabetes, and CAM users from many countries showed positive perception towards its use. However, little is known about the perception of individuals with diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Objectives: This study was aimed to assess the perception of the individuals with diabetes of Jazan region in Saudi Arabia towards CAM. Methods: An online, anonymous cross-sectional survey was designed and conducted between September 5 and December 31, 2021. Data were collected using 19-item self-report survey from the individuals with diabetes of the Jazan region. Results: A total of 359 validated responses were received. Approximately, 34% of the participants reported using CAM with modern medicine to control diabetes. Most of the participants reported that CAM is affordable, accessible, acceptable, and effective. Of the study sample, 28% reported using herbal medicine to control diabetes. Significantly, higher percentages of CAM users reported media (42% vs 27%) and friends/family (31% vs 27%) as the primary sources of information about CAM as compared to non-CAM users. Individuals who used CAM for diabetes showed significantly more positive perception ( Conclusion: A quarter of the sample of individuals with diabetes used herbal medicine to control diabetes. Individuals who ever used CAM for diabetes showed positive perception towards CAM. However, there is a need of healthcare workers to be involved in educating the individuals with diabetes and the general public in order to use CAM more effectively and safely.

Identifiers

PMID35571737
PMCPMC9098292
OpenAlexW4229011250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.