Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571720›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

An External-Validated Prediction Model to Predict Lung Metastasis among Osteosarcoma: A Multicenter Analysis Based on Machine Learning.

Wenle Li, Wencai Liu, Fida Hussain Memon, Bing Wang, Chan Xu, Shengtao Dong, Haosheng Wang, Zhaohui Hu, Xubin Quan, Yizhuo Deng and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Wenle LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Wencai LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-3125
Fida Hussain MemonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan.
Bing WangClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Chan XuClinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Shengtao DongDepartment of Spine Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-026X
Haosheng WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhaohui HuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Xubin QuanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Yizhuo DengDepartment of Spine Surgery, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-0962
Shibin SuDepartment of Business Management, Xiamen Bank, Xiamen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-5863
Chengliang YinFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8262-5749
Xian Yang Central Hospital · CNDalian Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNGuilin Medical University · CNLiuzhou General Hospital · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MONanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNSukkur IBA University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung metastasis greatly affects medical therapeutic strategies in osteosarcoma. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model to predict the risk of lung metastasis among osteosarcoma patients based on machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: We retrospectively collected osteosarcoma patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and from four hospitals in China. Six ML algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were applied to build predictive models for predicting lung metastasis using patient's demographics, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic variables from the SEER database. The model was internally validated using 10-fold cross-validation to calculate the mean area under the curve (AUC) and the model was externally validated using the Chinese multicenter osteosarcoma data. Relative importance ranking of predictors was plotted to understand the importance of each predictor in different ML algorithms. The correlation heat map of predictors was plotted to understand the correlation of each predictor, selecting the 10-fold cross-validation with the highest AUC value in the external validation ROC curve to build a web calculator. Results: Of all enrolled patients from the SEER database, 17.73% (194/1094) developed lung metastasis. The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that sex, N stage, T stage, surgery, and bone metastasis were all independent risk factors for lung metastasis. In predicting lung metastasis, the mean AUCs of the six ML algorithms ranged from 0.711 to 0.738 in internal validation and 0.697 to 0.729 in external validation. Among the six ML algorithms, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model had the highest AUC value with an average internal AUC of 0.738 and an external AUC of 0.729. The best performing ML algorithm model was used to build a web calculator to facilitate clinicians to calculate the risk of lung metastasis for each patient. Conclusions: The XGBoost model may have the best prediction effect and the online calculator based on this model can help doctors to determine the lung metastasis risk of osteosarcoma patients and help to make individualized medical strategies.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaHumansMachine LearningModels, StatisticalPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35571720
PMCPMC9106476
OpenAlexW4229020811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.