Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571706›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Preserving the Privacy of Healthcare Data over Social Networks Using Machine Learning.

T Veeramakali, A Shobanadevi, Nihar Ranjan Nayak, Sumit Kumar, Sunita Singhal, Manoharan Subramanian

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

T VeeramakaliDepartment of Data Science and Business Systems, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India.
A ShobanadeviDepartment of Data Science and Business Systems, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-4695
Nihar Ranjan NayakSri Venkateswara College of Engineering Technology, Chittoor, India.
Sumit KumarIndian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, India.
Sunita SinghalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur 303007, India.
Manoharan SubramanianDepartment of Computer Science, School of Informatics and Electrical Engineering, Hachalu Hundesa Campus, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1425-2749
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · INAmbo University · ETIndian Institute of Management Kozhikode · INManipal University Jaipur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in clinical recommendation systems is the problem of aberrant patient profiles in social networks. As a result of a person's abnormal profile, numerous vests might be used to make fake remarks about them, cyber bullying, or cyber-attacks. Many clinical researchers have done extensive study on this topic. The most recent studies on this topic are summarized, and an overarching framework is provided. When it comes to the methods and datasets that make up the data collection, the feature presentation and algorithm selection layers provide an overview of the various types of algorithm selections available. The categorization and evaluation of diseases and disorders has been one of the major advantages of machine learning in medical. Because it was harder to predict, it rendered it more controllable. It might range from difficult-to-find cancers in the early stages to certain other illnesses spread through the bloodstream. In healthcare, we may pick methods in machine learning depending on reliable outcomes. To do so, we must run the findings through each method. The major issue arises during information training and validation. Because the dataset is so large, eliminating mistakes might be difficult. The providers, other characteristics, various algorithms, data labelling techniques, and assessment criteria are all presented and contrasted in depth. Detecting anomalous users in medical social networks, on the other hand, is a work in progress. The result evaluation layer provides an explanation of how to evaluate and mark up the results of the various algorithm selection layers. Finally, it looks forward to more study in this area.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrivacyAlgorithmsDelivery of Health CareHumansSocial Networking

Identifiers

PMID35571706
PMCPMC9098267
OpenAlexW4229055940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.