ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
FDCNet: Presentation of the Fuzzy CNN and Fractal Feature Extraction for Detection and Classification of Tumors.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Techniques, Applications, and Potential Future Opportunities in Pressure Injuries (Bedsores) Management: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Advancing Precision Medicine: Algebraic Topology and Differential Geometry in Radiology and Computational Pathology.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024Review
- Fractal Geometry Meets Computational Intelligence: Future Perspectives.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Article
- An Approach for Cardiac Coronary Detection of Heart Signal Based on Harris Hawks Optimization and Multichannel Deep Convolutional Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging is currently one of the biggest challenges in artificial intelligence and medical engineering. It is important to identify these brain tumors as early as possible, as they can grow to death. Brain tumors can be classified as benign or malignant. Creating an intelligent medical diagnosis system for the diagnosis of brain tumors from MRI imaging is an integral part of medical engineering as it helps doctors detect brain tumors early and oversee treatment throughout recovery. In this study, a comprehensive approach to diagnosing benign and malignant brain tumors is proposed. The proposed method consists of four parts: image enhancement to reduce noise and unify image size, contrast, and brightness, image segmentation based on morphological operators, feature extraction operations including size reduction and selection of features based on the fractal model, and eventually, feature improvement according to segmentation and selection of optimal class with a fuzzy deep convolutional neural network. The BraTS data set is used as magnetic resonance imaging data in experimental results. A series of evaluation criteria is also compared with previous methods, where the accuracy of the proposed method is 98.68%, which has significant results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.