Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571679›Full record

ArticleHGG advances2022

Improving polygenic prediction with genetically inferred ancestry.

Olivier Naret, Zoltan Kutalik, Flavia Hodel, Zhi Ming Xu, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Jacques Fellay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HGG advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Barriers and Facilitators to Genetic Education, Risk Assessment, and Testing: Considerations on Advancing Equitable Genetics Care.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Article
  11. Swiss Cohort & Biobank - The White Paper.Public health reviews · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier NaretSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Zoltan KutalikSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Flavia HodelSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Zhi Ming XuSchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pedro Marques-VidalDepartment of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jacques FellaySchool of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have demonstrated that most common diseases have a strong genetic component from many genetic variants each with a small effect size. GWAS summary statistics have allowed the construction of polygenic scores (PGSs) estimating part of the individual risk for common diseases. Here, we propose to improve PGS-based risk estimation by incorporating genetic ancestry derived from genome-wide genotyping data. Our method involves three cohorts: a base (or discovery) for association studies, a target for phenotype/risk prediction, and a map for ancestry mapping; successively, (1) it generates for each individual in the base and target cohorts a set of principal components based on the map cohort-called mapped PCs, (2) it associates in the base cohort the phenotype with the mapped-PCs, and (3) it uses the mapped PCs in the target cohort to generate a phenotypic predictor called the ancestry score. We evaluated the ancestry score by comparing a predictive model using a PGS with one combining a PGS and an ancestry score. First, we performed simulations and found that the ancestry score has a greater impact on traits that correlate with ancestry-specific variants. Second, we showed, using UK Biobank data, that the ancestry score improves genetic prediction for our nine phenotypes to very different degrees. Third, we performed simulations and found that the more heterogeneous the base and target cohorts, the more beneficial the ancestry score is. Finally, we validated our approach under realistic conditions with UK Biobank as the base cohort and Swiss individuals from the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study as the target cohort.

Identifiers

PMID35571679
PMCPMC9095896
OpenAlexW4224300944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.