Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571645›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Preoperative MRI features predict failed breast-conserving surgery: construction of a predictive model.

Yu-Hong Qu, Ying-Jian He, Xiao-Ting Li, Zhao-Qing Fan, Rui-Jia Sun, Xing Wang, Tao Ouyang, Ying-Shi Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-Hong Qu *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ying-Jian He *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Ting LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhao-Qing FanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Rui-Jia SunKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xing WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Tao OuyangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ying-Shi SunKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the preferred method for early breast cancer, and the accurate preoperative prediction of the feasibility of BCS can formulate the surgical plan and reduce the violation of the patient's will. The present study proposed to explore the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with failed BCS and constructed an MRI-based model to predict BCS. Methods: This retrospective study included patients between March 2015 and July 2016, who planned to undergo BCS, had preoperative MRI examination, and had at least 2 years of follow-up. A total of 30 patients with failed BCS were identified and matched with 90 patients with successful BCS (ratio 1:3) according to age, neoadjuvant therapy, and hormone receptor expression. The patients were divided into the training group for model construction and the testing group for model validation. The MRI features, including the site of the tumor, the lesion type, and the lesion and breast volume, were compared between failure and successful BCS groups. A multivariate logistic model for predicting failed BCS was constructed using independent factors associated with failed BCS from the training group and was evaluated in the testing group. The performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 45.7±10.3 years. A significantly more non-mass lesion and multifocality, the larger volume of lesion, and the ratio of lesion and breast volume were observed in failed BCS group compared to the successful BCS group. The ratio of lesion and breast volume and multifocality were independent factors associated with failed BCS, odds ratios were 1.044 (95% CI: 1.016-1.074) and 11.161 (95% CI: 1.739-71.652), respectively. An MRI-based model for predicting failed BCS was established, the area under the ROC curves in the training and testing group were 0.902 and 0.821, respectively. Conclusions: This model might help clinicians predict failed BCS preoperatively and make an accurate surgical strategy.

Indexed as

breast-conserving surgery (BCS)Breast neoplasmmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)mastectomysegmentaltumor burden

Identifiers

PMID35571645
PMCPMC9091030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.