ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of ComOn coaching for oncology nurses.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The available tools to assess the communication skills of oncology nurses are limited, and the ComOn Coaching scale may be appropriate for this purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the ComOn Coaching scale from a patient-centered perspective. Methods: The participants were 296 oncology nurses and 42 nursing students. To assess construct, convergent, criterion, and known-group validities and the reliability of the ComOn Coaching scale, the Patient Care Communication Scale, the Korean version of the Watson Caritas Patient Score, and Cancer Survivor Integrated Supportive Care Competence were used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach's alpha values were calculated. Differential item functions were analyzed. Results: Three factors were extracted from 12 items, and the cumulative variance was 58.8% of the total variance. The three extracted factors were based on the contents of the original scale: Factor 1, Structure of conversation; Factor 2, Building rapport; and Factor 3, Verbal communications skills. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the construct validity of the instrument [χ Conclusions: The Korean ComOn Coaching scale may be a useful self-checking tool for the communication skills of oncology nurses. Repeated use of the Korean ComOn Coaching scale can provide practical information for developing a communication skills program for these professionals and testing its outcomes in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.