Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571448›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

A comparative study of changes in audiological characteristics when using endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery in patients with otosclerosis.

Yiyang Tang, Minqian Gao, Tao Zhang, Haidi Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic versus microscopic stapedotomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating all comparative evidence.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiyang TangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Minqian GaoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Haidi YangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic stapes surgery (ESS) is widely used to treat patients with otosclerosis, and accumulating evidence demonstrates that endoscopic stapedotomy is feasible and has similar, and often even better, audiological outcomes compared with microscopic stapedotomy. There is a lack of studies on comparisons of ESS and the audiological outcomes of ESS and microscopic stapes surgery (MSS). Therefore, in the present study, we investigated these to figure out if ESS could be a reasonable alternative treatment for otosclerosis patients. Methods: This was a cohort study of 65 patients with otosclerosis who underwent ESS (n=30) or MSS (n=35) between 2017 and 2021, whose diagnoses were mainly based on a history of progressive conductive or mixed deafness over 25 dB in the range of 0.25-4 kHz. Preoperative and postoperative audiological evaluation, including air-conduction (AC), bone-conduction (BC) and air-bone gap (ABG), was carried out using pure-tone audiometry and performed within 4 weeks before surgery and from 1-14 months after surgery. Results: Thirty ESS and 35 MSS patients were included. There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative pure-tone average AC (AC-PTA), BC-PTA, and ABG-PTA between the 2 groups. Postoperative ABG ≤10 dB was found in 8 ESS patients (60%) and 15 MSS patients (43%) (P=0.168). AC and ABG changes in the low-frequency (LF) and mid-frequency (MF) ranges were greater than those in the high-frequency (HF) range for both groups (P<0.05). Although auditory changes between the 2 groups were similar, MSS appeared to have a better BC-PTA compared with ESS (P=0.049). Shifts in ABG and BC were linearly related to preoperative ABG and BC in both groups, and shifts in AC were linearly related to preoperative AC in the ESS group (P<0.05). Conclusions: ESS had a similar audiological outcome compared with MSS, and LF and MF hearing improved to a greater degree than HF hearing in both groups in our study. Based on the linear regression analysis in our study, preoperative ABG-PTA was proved to be the most efficient surgical indicator for both types of stapes surgery for patients with otosclerosis.

Indexed as

Endoscopicmicroscopicotosclerosisstapedotomystapes surgery

Identifiers

PMID35571448
PMCPMC9096422
OpenAlexW4280611684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.