ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
The relationship between anal disease and quality of life: a bibliometric study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A DWI histogram-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of pathogens and antibiotic resistance in perianal abscesses.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Proctological disorders: psychometrics assessment of personality features and clinical evaluation.Updates in surgery · 2023Observational
- Exploring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistulas: A Comprehensive Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anal disease has a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), and surgical treatment may further diminish QoL. The purpose of this study was to conduct bibliometric analysis to investigate the profile of studies on anorectal disease-related QoL. Methods: The database of Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) in Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) was searched. The search terms were "anal diseases" and "quality of life". The bibliometrix package of R software was used to analyze the literature on anorectal diseases and QoL. The content of the analysis included the following: the number of papers published in this field by each country, the cooperation relationship between countries, the number of papers published by institutions, the cooperation relationship between institutions, the number of papers published by researchers, the cooperation relationship between researchers, the citations of researchers, the number of articles published in journals, and the use of keywords. Results: A total of 1,130 related research literature records were retrieved in this study. An annually increasing trend was detected in the number of published papers and the number of citations. Developed countries in Europe and America, mainly the United States, the United Kingdom (UK), and Germany, were in a leading position in this field. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Mayo Clinic in the United States, St. Mark's Hospital in the UK, and the University of Toronto in Canada were the leading research institutions in this field. The top 3 researchers with the most published papers were Feza H. Remzi, Bo Shen, and Victor W. Fazio. Collaboration among researchers was clustered. There were more high-quality related articles in professional journals of anal diseases. The use of keywords suggested a temporal change in research focus, but randomized controlled studies were found to be lacking. Conclusions: Asian countries should participate in more collaborative research projects in the field of anorectal disease, and more randomized controlled studies should be conducted overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.