ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05876975 (Vaginal Axis on MRI After Laparoscopic Pectopexy Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vaginal Axis on MRI After Laparoscopic Pectopexy Surgery: a Controlled Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological Reconstruction for Moderate-Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Multicenter Retrospective Self-Controlled Study.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse complicated with stress urinary incontinence: A Chinese expert consensus.Current urology · 2025Article
- The influence of the combined impairments and apical mesh surgery on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor system.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Alignment of the Cervix with the Vagina in Uterine Retroversion: A Possible Risk Factor in Uterine Prolapse.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and postoperative POP (case group) women from 2019 to 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. MRI diagnoses and measures of the relevant anatomical points at rest were used to analyze the healthy control data and the data from POP women before and after surgery. Results: The middle vaginal-PICS line angle (78.12°±15.03° Conclusions: The current study established that the uterine-vaginal axis of POP women moved backward and downward in the coordinate system, as shown on MRI sagittal images. Further, it moved forward and upwards after surgical repair and more closely resembled that of the control group. The uterine-vaginal axis may provide an evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.