ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Diagnostic test of bioimpedance-based neural network algorithm in early cervical cancer.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of bioimpedance measurement in clinical and allied fields: a comprehensive review.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Electrical impedance-based tissue classification for bladder tumor differentiation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A promising technique to improve and expand the practice of colposcopy to help the global fight against cervical cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colposcopy is a critical component of cervical cancer screening services, but the accuracy of colposcopy varies greatly due to the lack of standardized training for colposcopists and pathologists. Thus, to improve the accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of cervical lesions intelligently is urgent. Here, we explored the sensitivity and specificity of a bioimpedance-based neural network algorithm in distinguishing normal and precancerous cervical tissues. Methods: Bioimpedance data were collected using a bioimpedance analyzer (Mscan1.0B, Sealand Technology, Chengdu, China) from the cervices of 102 female patients with abnormal cervical cytology (≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) who required further colposcopy. Finally, the data of 106 samples from 37 patients were included, among which 85were used as the training set and 21 as the validation set. Using the biopsy pathology at each locus as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, likelihood ratio, and false positive and false negative rates of the bioimpedance-based neural network in identifying the normal and precancerous cervical tissues were calculated. Results: The bioimpedance method had a sensitivity of 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54 to 0.99], specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.97), positive predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.97), and a negative predictive value of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.99) in distinguishing normal and precancerous cervical tissues. The Kappa value was 0.72. Conclusions: The bioimpedance method was an intelligent method with relative good sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing benign cervical tissue and precancerous lesions and can therefore be used as an adjunctive test to colposcopy to improve the detection of cervical lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.