ArticleBulletin of the National Research Centre2022
GC-MS profiling and antibacterial activity of
Article in Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical investigation and anti-trichinellosis activity of some ficus species leaves: in silico supported in vitro study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Exploring the pharmacological potential of plant-based hand sanitizer composition: characterization, activity evaluation, and in silico assessment.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Hypoglycemic Properties ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Design of multiple-function matrix encapsulated with Marjoram extract to support cellular functions, stimulate collagen synthesis and decrease infection in wound.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anti-proliferative Activity ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024Article
- GC-MS Analysis of Persicaria bistorta: Uncovering the Molecular Basis of Its Traditional Medicinal Use.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Phytochemical analysis, radical scavenging and glioblastoma U87 cells toxicity studies of stem bark of buckthorn (Rhamnus pentapomica R. Parker).BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Bioactive compounds from fermentedIn silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Nematicidal Characterization ofACS omega · 2023Article
- Phytochemical Screening, Antifungal, and Anticancer Activities of Medicinal PlantsBioMed research international · 2022Article
- Antioxidant activities and toxicity of dichloromethane and n-hexane extracts ofJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Results: Sixteen bioactive compounds were detected in leaf extract and thirty-two compounds in root methanolic extract by GC-MS. The major potent compounds identified in leaf and root extracts were heptadecane 9-hexyl (43.65%) and stigmasterol (23.18%). The root extract showed increased antibacterial activity than leaf extract. Conclusion: These extracts possessed significant antibacterial activity against the tested bacterial isolates in dose-dependent manner. This study provides the phytoconstituents, antibacterial property and scientific evidence for the traditional claim and use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.