Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571358›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Usability challenges with electronic health records (EHRs) during prerounding on pediatric inpatients.

Jawad Alami, Clare Hammonds, Erin Hensien, Jenan Khraibani, Stephen Borowitz, Martha Hellems, Sara Lu Riggs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ICU Provider Perspectives on EHR Usability.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jawad AlamiDepartment of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-3500
Clare HammondsDepartment of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Erin HensienDepartment of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jenan KhraibaniDepartment of Computer and Communication Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Stephen BorowitzDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Martha HellemsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Sara Lu RiggsDepartment of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-9469
Engineering Systems (United States) · USUniversity of Virginia · USAmerican University of Beirut · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Prerounding is critical for a healthcare team to develop a shared understanding of the patient's condition and to develop a care plan. However, the design of electronic health records (EHRs) often makes prerounding inefficient, ineffective, and time consuming. The goal of this study was to observe how residents use the EHR while prerounding to identify usability challenges associated with the design of EHRs. Materials and Methods: Thirty residents were tasked to preround 2 pediatric patients using the think-aloud protocol. The data from the surveys, video recordings, and think-aloud comments were analyzed to identify usability issues related to EHR. The time it took for participants to complete the 6 required prerounding tasks were calculated and the pages most commonly accessed were noted. Results: Participants spent on average 6.5 min prerounding each patient with the most time spent on checking lab results and reviewing notes. Twenty-eight distinct pages were visited by at least 2 participants, mostly due to a lack of interconnectivity between related data across pages. Usability issues with the most commonly used pages include: data overload, missing/hidden information, difficulty identifying trends, and having to conduct manual calculations. Conclusions: We list usability issues and provide a set of recommendations to remedy these issues that include: reducing information access cost, creating a checklist, automate calculations, and standardizing notes and EHR training. Ideally, the outcome of this work will help improve EHR design to maximize the time clinicians spend interacting with and providing care to their patients.

Indexed as

EHRpediatricpreroundingusability

Identifiers

PMID35571358
PMCPMC9097610
OpenAlexW4220668225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.