Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571216›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Sex Differences in Characteristics, Treatments, and In-hospital Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention.

Shi-Qun Chen, Jin Liu, Yang Zhou, Zhi-Dong Huang, Yun Xie, Hao-Zhang Huang, Xiao-Ming Yan, Yong-Yi Xie, Peng-Fei Hao, Yan Liang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shi-Qun ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jin LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yang ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi-Dong HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yun XieDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hao-Zhang HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Ming YanDepartment of Information Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yong-Yi XieDepartment of Information Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Peng-Fei HaoDepartment of Information Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yan LiangDepartment of Cardiology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Shao-Hong DongDepartment of Cardiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiao-Yu HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Yangjiang People's Hospital, Yangjiang, China.
Li-Ling ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China.
Ning TanDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ji-Yan ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CNFujian Medical University · CNQujiang People's Hospital · CNShenZhen People’s Hospital · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whether women have a higher risk of adverse events compared with men following coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the sex differences in characteristics, treatments and outcomes among patients undergoing CAG and PCI in a large Chinese cohort. Methods: We analyzed patients undergoing CAG and/or PCI in this multi-center registry cohort study Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt II (CIN-II) in 5 Chinese tertiary hospitals from 2007 to 2020. Clinical characteristics, treatment (discharge medication and PCI) and in-hospital outcomes (mortality and major bleeding) were compared between women and men. Results: Totally 141,459 patients underwent CAG (44,362 [31.4%] women), of which 69,345 patients underwent PCI (15,376 [22.2%] women). Women were older (64.4 vs. 60.8 years), had more chronic comorbidities and lower PCI rate for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) than men (52.8 vs. 64.2%). Women received less CAG and PCI procedures. Among women undergoing PCI they received similar discharge medication treatment. In addition, women undergoing PCI had mildly lower rate of major bleeding (0.2 vs. 0.3%, Conclusion: Among our Chinese cohort, women are older with more chronic comorbidities, receiving less PCI procedure and similar discharge medication treatment. Women have nearly 90% higher risk of in-hospital mortality and over 1-fold increased risk of major bleeding after PCI compared with men.

Indexed as

coronary angiographycoronary artery diseaseoutcomepercutaneous coronary interventionsex differences

Identifiers

PMID35571216
PMCPMC9106109
OpenAlexW4225146341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.