Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571195›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Historical Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Learning From the Past to Move to the Future.

Julie Redfern, Robyn Gallagher, Adrienne O'Neil, Sherry L Grace, Adrian Bauman, Garry Jennings, David Brieger, Tom Briffa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Oncology Rehabilitation in Australia: A National Survey Update.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie RedfernFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Robyn GallagherFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adrienne O'NeilSchool of Medicine, IMPACT Institute, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Sherry L GraceFaculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adrian BaumanSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Garry JenningsNational Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David BriegerDepartment of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tom BriffaSchool of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUDeakin University · AUNational Heart Foundation of Australia · AUToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary myocardial infarction (MI) care and management has evolved dramatically since the 1950's; yet outpatient rehabilitation remains underutilized. Deepening our understanding of the origins and history of cardiac rehabilitation highlights a contemporary shift required for policy and practice related to secondary prevention of coronary disease in light of societal changes as well as medical, digital and surgical advancements. Contemporary "cardiac rehabilitation" began when bed rest and physical inactivity was recommended and commonplace for MI survivors. Today, most patients who survive an MI, undergo reperfusion therapy, a short inpatient stay and are discharged with minimal physical morbidity. Despite this, the majority of modern day programs continue to be structured in the same way they have been for the past 50 years and this model has become incongruent with the contemporary context, especially in the COVID-19 era. This review aims to describe the historical foundations of cardiac rehabilitation to inform solutions and meet the demands of contemporary MI management. Delivering health systems reform to address modernization is current healthcare challenge where a united and interdisciplinary effort is needed.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationdatadigital healthheartsecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID35571195
PMCPMC9091441
OpenAlexW4224927252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.