Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35571129›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2022

What Do We Know About Medical Cannabis in Neurological Disorders and What Are the Next Steps?

Clémence Lacroix, Isabelle Alleman-Brimault, Arnaud Zalta, Frank Rouby, Catherine Cassé-Perrot, Elisabeth Jouve, Laurence Attolini, Romain Guilhaumou, Joëlle Micallef, Olivier Blin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clémence LacroixAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Isabelle Alleman-BrimaultAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Arnaud ZaltaAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Frank RoubyAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Catherine Cassé-PerrotAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Elisabeth JouveAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Laurence AttoliniAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Romain GuilhaumouAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Joëlle MicallefAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Olivier BlinAPHM, INSERM, Inst Neurosci Syst, UMR 1106, Aix Marseille Univ, University Hospital Federation DHUNE, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRInstitut de Neurosciences des Systèmes · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical use of cannabis has been receiving growing attention over the last few decades in modern medicine. As we know that the endocannabinoid system is largely involved in neurological disorders, we focused on the scientific rationale of medical cannabis in three neurological disorders: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease through pharmacological plausibility, clinical studies, and patients' view. Clinical studies (randomized controlled trials, open-label studies, cohorts, and case reports) exploring medical cannabis in these disorders show different results depending on the methods and outcomes. Some show benefits on motor symptoms and others on non-motor symptoms and quality of life. Concerning patients' view, several web surveys were collected, highlighting the real use of cannabis to relieve symptoms of neurological disorders, mostly outside a medical pathway. This anarchic use keeps questioning particularly in terms of risks: consumption of street cannabis, drug-drug interactions with usual medical treatment, consideration of medical history, and adverse reactions (psychiatric, respiratory, cardiovascular disorders, etc.), underlining the importance of a medical supervision. To date, most scientific data support the therapeutic potential of cannabis in neurological disorders. As far as patients and patients' associations are calling for it, there is an urgent need to manage clinical studies to provide stronger evidence and secure medical cannabis use.

Indexed as

Alzheimeramyotrophic lateral sclerosismedical cannabisneurological disordersParkinsonpharmacologyscientific research

Identifiers

PMID35571129
PMCPMC9091192
OpenAlexW4224930312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.