ReviewFrontiers in public health2022
A Bibliometric Analysis of Personal Protective Equipment and COVID-19 Researches.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The top 100 most cited articles on mucopolysaccharidoses: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Global trends and knowledge mapping of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome research: a bibliometric analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mapping the global research landscape on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance: A visualization and bibliometric study.World journal of hepatology · 2024Article
- Bibliometric and visualized analysis of hydrogels in organoids research.Regenerative therapy · 2024Review
- The state of current research on COVID-19 and antibiotic use: global implications for antimicrobial resistance.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices about COVID-19 pandemic: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Cardiac Involvement in COVID-19: A Global Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on post-stroke pneumonia: Current development status and research Frontiers.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Most Cited Papers on Vesiculobullous Oral Lesions.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19, which occurred at the end of December 2019, has evolved into a global public health threat and affects every aspect of human life. COVID-19's high infectivity and mortality prompted governments and the scientific community to respond quickly to the pandemic outbreak. The application of personal protective equipment (PPE) is of great significance in overcoming the epidemic situation. Since the discovery of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), bibliometric analysis has been widely used in many aspects of the COVID-19 epidemic. Although there are many reported studies about PPE and COVID-19, there is no study on the bibliometric analysis of these studies. The citation can be used as an indicator of the scientific influence of an article in its field. The aim of this study was to track the research trends and latest hotspots of COVID-19 in PPE by means of bibliometrics and visualization maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.