Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570960›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Work Content of General Practitioners in Beijing, China: A Multi-method Study.

Yun Wei, Feiyue Wang, Zhaolu Pan, Guanghui Jin, Dawei Wang, Xiaoqin Lu, Qiumei Cao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yun WeiDepartment of General Practice, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Feiyue WangDepartment of General Practice, School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhaolu PanDepartment of General Practice, School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guanghui JinDepartment of General Practice, School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dawei WangDepartment of General Practice, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqin LuDepartment of General Practice, School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qiumei CaoDepartment of General Practice, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the dramatic growth of primary care in China, little evidence showed what general practitioner (GP) do and how GP provided medical service in Beijing. Objective: This study aimed to explore the work content of GPs in primary care in Beijing. Methods: A multi-method study was conducted in five community health service institutions using non-participant observation and critical incident technique interview. Eleven GPs was recruited by purpose sampling, with each GP recording details of 100 patient encounters. Health problems of patients and activities of GPs were observed in consultations. Then, critical incident technique interviews were conducted focusing on GPs' works out of clinics and challenge. Results: A total of 1, 100 patients encounters and 1,897 reasons for encounter (RFEs) were recorded from 11 GPs. There were 1897 RFEs (1.72 per encounter) and 2,762 health problems (2.51 per encounter) from 1,100 encounters during our observation. GPs' work related to consultation was focus on disease diagnoses and treatment. Physical examination and investigations were performed in only 15.5 and 17.1% consultations, respectively. Procedures for chronic disease management were infrequently provided to patients (0.4-26.6%). Time spent in each work process in consultations ranged from 0.68 ± 0.27 min for reservation to 4.00 ± 2.45 min for surgical treatment. In addition to clinical work, there were tasks about health files, contracted family doctor services, health education, teaching students, and scientific research. Conclusion: This study illustrated the complexity of GPs' work and heavy workload in Beijing, China. More attention and effort are needed to develop GPs performance and release GPs' work workload in primary care.

Indexed as

General PractitionersBeijingChinaHealth ServicesHumansReferral and ConsultationChinaconsultationgeneral practitionerhealth promotionquality of carework content

Identifiers

PMID35570960
PMCPMC9096235
OpenAlexW4224999690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.