ArticleRadiology case reports2022
Novel 2D long film imaging utility to avoid wrong level spinal surgery.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Statistical Surgical Process Modeling: Analysis of Workflow and Performance of Emerging Technologies in Image-Guided Spine Surgery.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wrong-level spinal surgery (WLSS) can lead to increased morbidity, cost, and worse long-term outcomes. Current intraoperative localization methods rely on counting spinal levels from a known reference location using fluoroscopy. Miscounting from a reference is an intraoperative error that leads to WLSS, especially for those with anatomical variations. The problem is exacerbated when fluoroscopy is not able to produce images with the clarity needed to confidently count levels, a prevalent issue for obese patients. A new feature called the "2D Long Film'' is available for the Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN) O-arm Surgical Imaging System. Using this novel technology and standard fluoroscopy, this study reports the imaging of two obese adult female patients with a body mass index of 36.9 and 42.0 undergoing transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion. Fluoroscopy images of obese patients are difficult to capture for two reasons: increased scatter and restricted field of view. This report demonstrates that 2D Long Film can improve both these issues for obese patients in need of thoracic localization. The 2D Long Film captures existing instrumentation, localization needles, and the vertebral levels in a clear single image. We display the differences between standard fluoroscopy and the 2D Long Film for thoracic level localization, demonstrating a potential new standard of care and better visualization, leading to a less challenging vertebrae localization process, potentially mitigating WLSS risk. The quality of this new 2D Long Film feature could also reduce time in the operating room and the necessity of other visualization methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.