ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2022
[Research progress of cementless intercalary prosthesis stem].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the research progress of cementless intercalary prosthesis stem. Methods: The literature about the cementless intercalary prosthesis in treatment of bone defects of extremities was reviewed, and the designing and application of prosthesis stem were analyzed. Results: Cementless intercalary prosthesis has the advantages of good biocompatibility. However, there are also some disadvantages, including the multiple factors affecting the fixation of the prosthesis stem and individual differences in the stability of the prosthesis. The methods to improve the fixation stability of prosthesis stem mainly include the optimization of prosthesis stem shape, addition of auxiliary fixation, and improvement of coating materials on the stem surface as well as porous structure of the stem surface. Among these methods, augment with auxiliary fixation has the most satisfactory effect on improving the stability of prosthesis. However, the deficiency of the method is the increasing risk of the larger incision exposure and surgical trauma. Conclusion: Improving the design and fixation method of the cementless intercalary prosthesis stem can further improve the stability of the prosthesis. Under the premise of avoiding increasing surgical trauma as much as possible, addition of the auxiliary fixation can be a feasible choice to improve the fixation stability of prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.