Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570329›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2022

Comparison of the effects of perineural or intravenous dexamethasone on thoracic paravertebral block in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A double-blind randomized trial.

Yan Zhang, Lu Qiao, Wenping Ding, Kai Wang, Yuqiong Chen, Liwei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, The Affiliated XuZhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Lu QiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, The Affiliated XuZhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Wenping DingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, The Affiliated XuZhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, The Affiliated XuZhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yuqiong ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Liwei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, The Affiliated XuZhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CNXuzhou Central Hospital · CNSuzhou Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to prolong thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) analgesia include local anesthetic adjuvants, such as dexamethasone (Dex). Previous studies showed that both perineural (PN) and intravenous (i.v.) routes could prolong analgesia. As PN Dex is an off-label use, anesthesiologists should be fully informed of the clinical differences, if any, on block duration. This study was designed to evaluate the two administration routes of Dex for duration of analgesia in TPVB. Ninety-five patients scheduled for Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were randomized to receive TPVB (0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml), PN or i.v. Dex 8 mg. The primary end point was the duration of analgesia. The secondary end points included pain scores, analgesic consumption, adverse effects rate, and incidence of chronic pain at 3 months postoperatively. The PN-Dex group showed better analgesic effects than the i.v.-Dex group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the visual analogue scale scores in patients at 2, 4, 8, and 12 h postoperatively were lower in the PN-Dex group than the i.v.-Dex group (p < 0.05). The analgesic consumption in both the PN-Dex and i.v.-Dex groups was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Regarding the incidence of chronic pain, regardless of route, Dex decreased the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain and neuropathic pain at 3 months after surgery (p < 0.05), but there were no clinical differences between the i.v.-Dex and PN-Dex groups. Perineural dexamethasone improved the magnitude and duration of analgesia compared to that of the i.v.-Dex group in TPVB in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. However, there were no clinically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNerve BlockDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodEsophagectomyHumansPostoperative PainDexamethasone

Identifiers

PMID35570329
PMCPMC9372414
OpenAlexW4280539030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.