ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022
Comparison of materials for rapid passive collection of environmental DNA.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects of multipurpose biomonitoring for fisheries assessment based on environmental nucleic acids.Journal of fish biology · 2026Review
- Integrating active and passive environmental DNA sampling into coral reef monitoring: implications for community-based stewardship in Hawai i.Research square · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Molecular Potential and Interpretability of DNA in Historical Spirit Collection Media.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- A Breath of Fresh Air: A Novel Passive Airborne eDNA Approach for Scalable Terrestrial Biodiversity Monitoring.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Developing and Evaluating Aquatic Passive Sampling of Environmental DNA for Microbial Community Profiling.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Environmental DNA sampling workflow matters: testing different approaches on marine microbial assemblages in three coastal areas of Greece.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Multi-Tool Marine Metabarcoding Bioassessment for Baselining and Monitoring Species and Communities in Kelp Habitats.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Passive eDNA Sampling Characterizes Fish Community Assembly in the Lancang River of Yunnan, China.Biology · 2025Article
- Elusive tropical forest canopy diversity revealed through environmental DNA contained in rainwater.Science advances · 2025Article
- Artificial Waterbodies: A Valuable Source of eDNA for Detecting Threatened Birds.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Design and Validation of an Open-Close Device for Integrated Environmental DNA Sampling Detects A Depth Gradient in Indian Ocean Deep-Sea Fish Assemblages.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- No pump, no problem: evaluating passive eDNA sampling for marine biomonitoring of a nuisance macroalga.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of materials for rapid passive collection of environmental DNA.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Capturing marine microbiomes and environmental DNA: A field sampling guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Passive collection is an emerging sampling method for environmental DNA (eDNA) in aquatic systems. Passive eDNA collection is inexpensive and efficient, and requires minimal equipment, making it suited to high-density sampling and remote deployment. Here, we compare the effectiveness of nine membrane materials for passively collecting fish eDNA from a 3-million-litre marine mesocosm. We submerged materials (cellulose, cellulose with 1% and 3% chitosan, cellulose overlayed with electrospun nanofibres and 1% chitosan, cotton fibres, hemp fibres, and sponge with either zeolite or active carbon) for intervals between 5 and 1080 min. We show that for most materials, with as little as 5 min of submersion, mitochondrial fish eDNA measured with qPCR, and fish species richness measured with metabarcoding, was comparable to that collected by conventional filtering. Furthermore, PCR template DNA concentrations and species richness were generally not improved significantly by longer submersion. Species richness detected for all materials ranged between 11 and 37 species, with a median of 27, which was comparable to the range for filtered eDNA (19-32). Using scanning electron microscopy, we visualized biological matter adhering to the surface of materials, rather than entrapped, with images also revealing a diversity in size and structure of putative eDNA particles. eDNA can be collected rapidly from seawater with a passive approach and using a variety of materials. This will suit cost- and time-sensitive biological surveys, and where access to equipment is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.