Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570323›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022

Comparison of materials for rapid passive collection of environmental DNA.

Cindy Bessey, Yuan Gao, Yen Bach Truong, Haylea Miller, Simon Neil Jarman, Oliver Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cindy BesseyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Indian Oceans Marine Research Centre, Oceans and Atmosphere, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-0214
Yuan GaoCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Yen Bach TruongCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-2414
Haylea MillerCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Indian Oceans Marine Research Centre, Environomics Future Science Platform, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-7107
Simon Neil JarmanUniversity of Western Australia, UWA Oceans Institute, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-9686
Oliver BerryCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Indian Oceans Marine Research Centre, Environomics Future Science Platform, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-5083

Funding

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Environomics Future Science Platform
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive collection is an emerging sampling method for environmental DNA (eDNA) in aquatic systems. Passive eDNA collection is inexpensive and efficient, and requires minimal equipment, making it suited to high-density sampling and remote deployment. Here, we compare the effectiveness of nine membrane materials for passively collecting fish eDNA from a 3-million-litre marine mesocosm. We submerged materials (cellulose, cellulose with 1% and 3% chitosan, cellulose overlayed with electrospun nanofibres and 1% chitosan, cotton fibres, hemp fibres, and sponge with either zeolite or active carbon) for intervals between 5 and 1080 min. We show that for most materials, with as little as 5 min of submersion, mitochondrial fish eDNA measured with qPCR, and fish species richness measured with metabarcoding, was comparable to that collected by conventional filtering. Furthermore, PCR template DNA concentrations and species richness were generally not improved significantly by longer submersion. Species richness detected for all materials ranged between 11 and 37 species, with a median of 27, which was comparable to the range for filtered eDNA (19-32). Using scanning electron microscopy, we visualized biological matter adhering to the surface of materials, rather than entrapped, with images also revealing a diversity in size and structure of putative eDNA particles. eDNA can be collected rapidly from seawater with a passive approach and using a variety of materials. This will suit cost- and time-sensitive biological surveys, and where access to equipment is limited.

Indexed as

ChitosanDNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsBiodiversityCelluloseDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEnvironmental MonitoringFishesCelluloseChitosanDNA, EnvironmentalbiotechnologyDNA barcodingenvironmental DNAfish

Identifiers

PMID35570323
PMCPMC9544503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.