Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570265›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2022

Accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time among children and their parents in the UK before and after COVID-19 lockdowns: a natural experiment.

Ruth Salway, Charlie Foster, Frank de Vocht, Byron Tibbitts, Lydia Emm-Collison, Danielle House, Joanna G Williams, Katie Breheny, Tom Reid, Robert Walker and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ruth SalwayCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Charlie FosterCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Frank de VochtBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, 2PS, UK.
Byron TibbittsCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Lydia Emm-CollisonCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Danielle HouseCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Joanna G WilliamsBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, 2PS, UK.
Katie BrehenyBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, 2PS, UK.
Tom ReidCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Robert WalkerCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK.
Sarah ChurchwardIndependent Public Member of the Project Team, Bristol, UK.
William HollingworthBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, 2PS, UK.
Russell JagoCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, ITZ, UK. Russ.Jago@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3394-0176

Funding

British Heart Foundation SP 14/4/31123British Heart Foundation SP/14/4/31123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestrictions due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reduced physical activity provision for both children and their parents. Recent studies have reported decreases in physical activity levels during lockdown restrictions, but these were largely reliant on self-report methods, with data collected via unrepresentative self-report surveys. The post-pandemic impacts on children's activity levels remain unknown. A key question is how active children become once lockdown restrictions are lifted.

methodsActive-6 is a repeated cross-sectional natural experiment. Accelerometer data from 1296 children aged 10-11 and their parents were collected in 50 schools in the Greater Bristol area, UK in March 2017-May 2018 (pre-COVID-19 comparator group), and compared to 393 children aged 10-11 and parents in 23 of the same schools, collected in May-December 2021. Mean minutes of accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were derived for weekdays and weekend and compared pre- and post-lockdown via linear multilevel models.

resultsAfter adjusting for seasonality, accelerometer wear time and child/parent demographics, children's mean weekday and weekend MVPA were 7.7 min (95% CI: 3.5 to 11.9) and 6.9 min (95% CI: 0.9 to 12.9) lower in 2021 than in 2018, respectively, while sedentary time was higher by 25.4 min (95% CI: 15.8 to 35.0) and 14.0 min (95% CI: 1.5 to 26.5). There was no evidence that differences varied by child gender or household education. There was no significant difference in parents' MVPA or sedentary time, either on weekdays or weekends.

conclusionsChildren's MVPA was lower by 7-8 min/day in 2021 once restrictions were lifted than before the pandemic for all groups, on both weekdays and weekends. Previous research has shown that there is an undesirable age-related decline in children's physical activity. The 8-min difference reported here would be broadly comparable to the decline that would have previously been expected to occur over a three-year period. Parents' physical activity was similar to pre-pandemic levels. Our results suggest that despite easing of restrictions, children's activity levels have not returned to pre-pandemic levels. There is an urgent need to understand why these changes have occurred and how long they are maintained.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sedentary BehaviorAccelerometryChildCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseHumansParentsUnited KingdomAdultsChildrenCOVID-19Physical activitySARS CoV 2Sedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID35570265
PMCPMC9107948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.