Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570260›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2022

The limited use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for fit older patients with multiple myeloma in India: a retrospective analysis.

Swaroop Revannasiddaiah, Prathap Raja Varma Muppalla Ayalgaraj Nagaraju, Rasmi Palassery, Apoorva Jagadish, Vinayak V Maka, Nalini Kilara, Damiano Rondelli, Santhosh Kumar Devadas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Swaroop RevannasiddaiahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
Prathap Raja Varma Muppalla Ayalgaraj NagarajuDepartment of Regulatory Affairs-Drugs, Biologics and Medical Devices, College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University, MB, Boston, USA.
Rasmi PalasseryDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
Apoorva JagadishDepartment of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre, Sheveport, USA.
Vinayak V MakaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
Nalini KilaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
Damiano RondelliDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Santhosh Kumar DevadasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India. hidrhere@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-0342
M.S. Ramaiah Medical College · INLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USNortheastern University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) predominantly affects older patients; many of whom do not undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) despite the associated survival benefits. This study was conceived to investigate the patterns of AHSCT among MM patients with due regard to their age and standardized fitness assessments.

methodsFitness scores as per the hematopoietic stem cell transplant-comorbidity index (HSCT-CI) and risk scores as per the revised-myeloma comorbidity index (R-MCI) of MM patients treated between January 2017 and December 2019 were analyzed to assess fitness for AHSCT. Proportions of patients who underwent AHSCT were calculated with regard to age and fitness for AHSCT.

resultsOf the 81 eligible patient records with a median age of 62 years, the HSCT-CI classified 79.6% and 77.8% of patients aged ≤65 years and >65 years as AHSCT eligible (p 1). Using the R-MCI, 96.3% and 81.5% of patients aged ≤65 years and >65 years, respectively, were classified as eligible for AHSCT (p 0.0381). Overall, patients aged ≤65 years underwent AHSCT with a greater frequency compared to those aged >65years (38.9 vs. 14.8%, p 0.0402). Irrespective of the age group, there was a statistically significant difference (p 0.0167) in terms of survival which favored those who underwent AHSCT.

conclusionsBoth the HSCT-CI and the R-MCI revealed that nearly 80% of patients aged >65 years were fit enough to receive AHSCT. However, far fewer patients of this age group underwent AHSCT. We propose that the routine inclusion of objective fitness assessment could ensure that fit older patients undergo AHSCT and thus do not miss out on the benefits of the same.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple MyelomaHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTransplantation, AutologousAge and fitnessAutologous hematopoietic transplant in older patientsAutologous transplantGeriatric myelomaMultiple myeloma fitness assessment

Identifiers

PMID35570260
PMCPMC13314279
OpenAlexW4280590974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.