Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570242›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Real-World Biologic Adherence, Persistence, and Monotherapy Comparisons in US Patients with Psoriasis: Results from IBM MarketScan

Craig Leonardi, Baojin Zhu, William N Malatestinic, William J Eastman, Jiaying Guo, Mwangi J Murage, Casey Kar-Chan Choong, Russel Burge, Andrew Blauvelt

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Craig LeonardiSaint Louis University School of Medicine, 1034 South Brentwood Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO, 63104, USA. Craig.Leonardi@centralderm.com.
Baojin ZhuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
William N MalatestinicEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
William J EastmanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jiaying GuoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mwangi J MurageEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Casey Kar-Chan ChoongEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Russel BurgeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrew BlauveltOregon Medical Research Center, Portland, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USOregon Medical Research Center · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLimited real-world data are available comparing multiple biologics on their adherence, persistence, and the use of concomitant biologics in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in clinical practice. The objective was to compare persistence of and adherence to ixekizumab (IXE) treatment, as monotherapy or with concomitant medication, versus patients receiving other commonly prescribed biologics.

methodsPatients who newly initiated IXE, adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETN), secukinumab (SEC), or ustekinumab (UST) in IBM MarketScan

resultsA higher proportion of patients receiving IXE had had previous biologic therapies (50.3%) versus other biologics (ADA: 9.1%, ETN: 10.9%, SEC: 33.9%, UST: 19.7%). Patients treated with IXE showed statistically (p < 0.001) greater persistence than patients treated with SEC, ADA, UST, or ETN at both 1-year follow-up and up to 3 years of follow-up. Adherence for patients treated with IXE was significantly (p < 0.001) higher compared to ADA, ETN, and UST at both 1-year follow-up and up to 3 years of follow-up. There was no significantly higher adherence in patients treated with IXE compared to those treated with SEC at 1-year follow-up, but IXE had higher adherence than SEC (p < 0.05) at 1-3 year follow-up. IXE showed longer time on monotherapy than ADA (p < 0.001), ETN (p < 0.001), SEC (p < 0.05), and UST (p < 0.001) for both 1-year and 1-3 year follow-up. Sensitivity analyses on persistence, adherence, and monotherapy with further model adjustments after IPTW confirmed the findings.

conclusionsPatients treated with IXE were more persistent on and adherent to treatment and remained on monotherapy longer compared to those on all other commonly prescribed biologics combined or with individual biologics.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPsoriasisAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDermatologic AgentsEtanerceptHumansMedication AdherenceRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUstekinumabAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiological ProductsDermatologic AgentsEtanerceptsecukinumabUstekinumabAdherenceBiologicsClaims databaseIxekizumabMonotherapyPersistencePsoriasisReal-world

Identifiers

PMID35570242
PMCPMC9239953
OpenAlexW4280578306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.