Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35570025›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of investigative dermatology2022

Understanding Human Epidermal Stem Cells at Single-Cell Resolution.

Victor Augusti Negri, Fiona M Watt

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Matricellular Proteins in the Homeostasis, Regeneration, and Aging of Skin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. CCN proteins: opportunities for clinical studies-a personal perspective.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Victor Augusti NegriCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona M WattCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Directors' Research Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: fiona.watt@embo.org.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/PO18823/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206439/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT211276/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human epidermis is one of the first tissues in which the existence of stem cells was recognized and is one of the few in which ex vivo expansion for tissue repair is established clinically. Nevertheless, the nature of stem cells has been elusive. Using clonal growth assays of cultured keratinocytes as a quantitative measure of their abundance, several candidate stem cell markers have been described. Recently, the volume and quality of single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets have increased exponentially, providing new opportunities to explore the nature of epidermal stem cells and test the validity of in vitro experimental models.

Indexed as

Epidermal CellsStem CellsCells, CulturedEpidermisHumansKeratinocytes

Identifiers

PMID35570025
PMCPMC9826868
OpenAlexW4280515573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.