ReviewAnalytica chimica acta2022
Applied tutorial for the design and fabrication of biomicrofluidic devices by resin 3D printing.
Review in Analytica chimica acta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a 3D-bioprinted tumour-on-chip with tunable hydrogel properties for monitoring colorectal cancer cell migration and invasion.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Decoding triple negative breast cancer bone metastasis: from 3D bioprinted models to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Hybrid additive manufacturing-based assembly of sacrificial isomalt scaffolds and gas exchange membranes for microfluidic artificial lung development.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent applications of parylene and pyrolyzed parylene in sensors and devices: a review.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Hydrogel array patterning using 3D-printed microfluidic inserts to control cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Sensors Manufacturing on a 3D-Printed Transwell-Based Hybrid Organ-on-a-Chip for Non-Invasive Real-Time Biological Barrier Resistance Monitoring.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Open-source tubing-free impeller pump platform for controlled recirculating fluid flow for microfluidics and organs-on-chip.HardwareX · 2025Article
- Parylene-C Modified OSTE Molds for PDMS Microfluidic Chip Fabrication and Applications in Plasma Separation and Polymorphic Crystallization.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Lymphoma-on-chip model reveals that lymph node stromal cells promote diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survival and migration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- From Soft Lithography to 3D Printing: Current Status and Future of Microfluidic Device Fabrication.Polymers · 2025Review
- Multilayered Manufacturing Method for Microfluidic Systems Using Low-Cost, Resin-Based Three-Dimensional Printing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A 3D-printed multi-compartment organ-on-chip platform with a tubing-free pump models communication with the lymph node.Lab on a chip · 2025Article
- Simple-Flow: A 3D-Printed Multiwell Flow Plate to Coculture Primary Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Evaluation of 3D-Printed Microfluidic Structures for Use in AML-Specific Biomarker Detection of PML::RARA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- 3D Printing of Microfluidic-assisted Liposomes Production for Drug Delivery and Nanobiomedicine: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Design and Biofunctionalization of Cloud Sponge-Inspired Scaffolds for Enhanced Bone Cell Performance.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- 3D digital light process bioprinting: Cutting-edge platforms for resolution of organ fabrication.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Design considerations for digital light processing bioprinters.Applied physics reviews · 2024Review
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Agarose Micromold Supports Scaffold-Free Mouse Ex Vivo Follicle Growth, Ovulation, and Luteinization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resin 3D printing, especially digital light processing (DLP) printing, is a promising rapid fabrication method for bio-microfluidic applications such as clinical tests, lab-on-a-chip devices, and sensor integrated devices. The benefits of 3D printing lead many to believe this fabrication method will accelerate the use of microfluidics, but there are a number of potential obstacles to overcome for bioanalytical labs to fully utilize this technology. For commercially available printing materials, this includes challenges in producing prints with the print resolution and mechanical stability required for a particular design, along with cytotoxic components within many photopolymerizing resins and low optical compatibility for imaging experiments. Potential solutions to these problems are scattered throughout the literature and rarely available in head-to-head comparisons. Therefore, we present here a concise guide to the principles of resin 3D printing most relevant for fabrication of bioanalytical microfluidic devices. Intended to quickly orient labs that are new to 3D printing, the tutorial includes the results of selected systematic tests to inform resin selection, strategies for design optimization, and improvement of biocompatibility of resin 3D printed bio-microfluidic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.