Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35569702›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2022

The where of when: Geographic variation in the timing of recent increases in US county-level heart disease death rates.

Adam S Vaughan, Aspen Flynn, Michele Casper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam S VaughanDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: avaughan@cdc.gov.
Aspen FlynnDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Michele CasperDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWithin the context of local increases in US heart disease death rates, we estimated when increasing heart disease death rates began by county among adults aged 35-64 years and characterized geographic variation.

methodsWe applied Bayesian spatiotemporal models to vital statistics data to estimate the timing (i.e., the year) of increasing county-level heart disease death rates during 1999-2019 among adults aged 35-64 years. To examine geographic variation, we stratified results by US Census region and urban-rural classification.

resultsThe onset of increasing heart disease death rates among adults aged 35-64 years spanned the two-decade study period from 1999 to 2019. Overall, 43.5% (95% CI: 41.3, 45.6) of counties began increasing before 2011, with early increases more prevalent outside of the most urban counties and outside of the Northeast. Roughly one-in-five (18.4% [95% CI: 15.6, 20.7]) counties continued to decline throughout the study period.

conclusionsThis variation suggests that factors associated with these geographic classifications may be critical in establishing the timing of changing trends in heart disease death rates. These results reinforce the importance of spatiotemporal surveillance in the early identification of adverse trends and in informing opportunities for tailored policies and programs.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesRural PopulationAdultBayes TheoremHumansUnited StatesGeographyHeart diseaseMortalityVital statistics

Identifiers

PMID35569702
PMCPMC9276638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.