Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35569581›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

Upper airway angle and glottic height: a prospective cohort to evaluate two new features for airway prediction.

Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Danielle Melo da Silva, Marina Sampaio Leite, Lívia Barboza de Andrade

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clístenes Crístian de CarvalhoInstituto de Medicina Integra Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Departamento de Cirurgia, Campina Grande, PA, Brazil. Electronic address: clistenescristian@hotmail.com.
Danielle Melo da SilvaHospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Marina Sampaio LeiteHospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Lívia Barboza de AndradeInstituto de Medicina Integra Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting difficult direct laryngoscopies remains challenging and improvements are needed in preoperative airway assessment. We conceived two new tests (the upper airway angle and the glottic height) and assessed their association with difficult direct laryngoscopies as well as their predictive performance.

methodsA prospective cohort was conducted with 211 patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures. We assessed the association between difficult laryngoscopies and modified Mallampati Test (MMT), Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Mandibular Length (ML), Neck Circumference (NC), Mouth Opening (MO), Sternomental Distance (SMD), Thyromental Distance (TMD), Upper Airway Angle (UAA), and Glottic Height (GH). We also estimated their predictive values.

resultsDifficult laryngoscopy was presented by 12 patients (5.7%). Six tests were significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopies and their area under the ROC curve, and 95% CIs were as follows: UAA = 88.82 (81.86-95.78); GH = 86.43 (72.67-100); ML = 83.75 (72.77-94.74); NC = 79.17 (64.98-93.36); MO = 65.58 (45.13-86.02); and MMT = 77.89 (68.37-87.41).

conclusionWe have found two new features (the UAA and the GH) to be significantly associated with the occurrence of difficult direct laryngoscopies. They also presented the best predictive performance amongst the nine evaluated tests in our cohort of patients. We cannot ensure, however, these tests to be superior to other regularly used bedside tests based on our estimated 95% CIs.

Indexed as

Airway managementLaryngoscopyPredictive values of testsSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID35569581
PMCPMC10533972
OpenAlexW4280566164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.