Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35569567›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2022

The unfulfilled potential of mucosal immunization.

James R Baker, Mohammad Farazuddin, Pamela T Wong, Jessica J O'Konek

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal immune response in biology, disease prevention and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mucosal immunotherapy targeting APC in lung disease.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Mast cell activators as adjuvants for intranasal mucosal vaccines.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James R BakerFrom the Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. Electronic address: jbakerjr@umich.edu.
Mohammad FarazuddinFrom the Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Pamela T WongFrom the Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Jessica J O'KonekFrom the Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF NANOVAX TM (OIL IN WATER NANOEMULSION ADJUVANT) FORMULATED ALLERGENS AS INTRANASAL IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC VACCINES FOR PEANUT ALLERGY.75N93019C00035 · NIAID · BLUEWILLOW BIOLOGICS, INC. · PI FATTOM, ALI I. · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Combined adjuvant approaches for enhancement of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacyR01AI160706 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHOTSAERT, MICHAEL, WONG, PAMELA TINMOI · 2022 to 2025
$2.9M
Mechanistic evaluation of Th2-polarizing bystander effects of early life immunization with alumR21AI155944 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI O'KONEK, JESSICA JANE · 2021 to 2022
$429k
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00035NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030031NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI160706NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI155944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent events involving the global coronavirus pandemic have focused attention on vaccination strategies. Although tremendous advances have been made in subcutaneous and intramuscular vaccines during this time, one area that has lagged in implementation is mucosal immunization. Mucosal immunization provides several potential advantages over subcutaneous and intramuscular routes, including protection from localized infection at the site of entry, clearance of organisms on mucosal surfaces, induction of long-term immunity through establishment of central and tissue-resident memory cells, and the ability to shape regulatory responses. Despite these advantages, significant barriers remain to achieving effective mucosal immunization. The epithelium itself provides many obstacles to immunization, and the activation of immune recognition and effector pathways that leads to mucosal immunity has been difficult to achieve. This review will highlight the potential advantages of mucosal immunity, define the barriers to mucosal immunization, examine the immune mechanisms that need to be activated on mucosal surfaces, and finally address recent developments in methods for mucosal vaccination that have shown promise in generating immunity on mucosal surfaces in human trials.

Indexed as

ImmunizationVaccinesHumansImmunity, MucosalMucous MembraneVaccinationVaccinesbarriers to mucosal immunizationinnate lymphoid cellsMucosal vaccinesrespiratory infectionssterile immunitytissue resident memory cells

Identifiers

PMID35569567
PMCPMC9098804
OpenAlexW4280581493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.