Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35569448›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2022

Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Waleed Alhazzani, Ken Kuljit S Parhar, Jason Weatherald, Zainab Al Duhailib, Mohammed Alshahrani, Abdulrahman Al-Fares, Sarah Buabbas, Sujith V Cherian, Laveena Munshi, Eddy Fan and 27 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04350723 nacompletednot on this map

Awake Prone Position in Hypoxemic Patients With Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVI-PRONE): A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonRan2020 to 2021Enrolled400ConditionsCorona Virus Infection, Covid19, COVID-19ArmsAwake Proning
NCT05689216 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Timed Awake Prone and Repositioning in Patients With Covid-19-induced Hypoxic Respiratory Failure: a Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineRan2023 to 2024Enrolled286ConditionsCorona Virus Infection, Hypoxic Respiratory FailureArmsAwake timed prone and repositioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Prone positioning in ARDS.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 18 institutions in 5 countries.

Waleed AlhazzaniDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ken Kuljit S ParharDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Jason WeatheraldLibin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Zainab Al DuhailibCritical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlshahraniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Al-FaresDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Al Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Sarah BuabbasDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Sujith V CherianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Critical Care, Pulmonary, and Sleep Medicine, University of Texas Health-McGovern Medical School, Houston.
Laveena MunshiInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fahad Al-HameedDepartment of Intensive Care, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jamal ChalabiIntensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Amera A RahmatullahCritical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Erick DuanDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer L Y TsangDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kimberley LewisDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
François LauzierDepartment of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
John CentofantiDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah CulginResearch Institute of St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Katlynne NelsonResearch Institute of St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sheryl Ann AbdukahilCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Haytham TlayjehCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maureen O MeadeDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dan PerriDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin SolversonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Daniel J NivenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Rachel LimDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Morten Hylander MøllerDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emilie Belley-CoteDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hani TamimCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Deborah J CookDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Yaseen M ArabiCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
COVI-PRONE Trial Investigators and the Saudi Critical Care Trials Group
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAAlberta Health Services · CAImpact · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAAlfaisal University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SANiagara Health System · CAUniversity Health Network · CAAl-Sabah Hospital · KWAmiri Hospital · KWCopenhagen University Hospital · DKKing Saud University · SAMcMaster University · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The efficacy and safety of prone positioning is unclear in nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of prone positioning in nonintubated adult patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, unblinded randomized clinical trial conducted at 21 hospitals in Canada, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the US. Eligible adult patients with COVID-19 were not intubated and required oxygen (≥40%) or noninvasive ventilation. A total of 400 patients were enrolled between May 19, 2020, and May 18, 2021, and final follow-up was completed in July 2021. Intervention: Patients were randomized to awake prone positioning (n = 205) or usual care without prone positioning (control; n = 195). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 30 days of randomization. The secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days, days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days, days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days, adverse events, and serious adverse events. Results: Among the 400 patients who were randomized (mean age, 57.6 years [SD, 12.83 years]; 117 [29.3%] were women), all (100%) completed the trial. In the first 4 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 4.8 h/d (IQR, 1.8 to 8.0 h/d) in the awake prone positioning group vs 0 h/d (IQR, 0 to 0 h/d) in the control group. By day 30, 70 of 205 patients (34.1%) in the prone positioning group were intubated vs 79 of 195 patients (40.5%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12], P = .20; absolute difference, -6.37% [95% CI, -15.83% to 3.10%]). Prone positioning did not significantly reduce mortality at 60 days (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.40], P = .54; absolute difference, -1.15% [95% CI, -9.40% to 7.10%]) and had no significant effect on days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days or on days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days. There were no serious adverse events in either group. In the awake prone positioning group, 21 patients (10%) experienced adverse events and the most frequently reported were musculoskeletal pain or discomfort from prone positioning (13 of 205 patients [6.34%]) and desaturation (2 of 205 patients [0.98%]). There were no reported adverse events in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19, prone positioning, compared with usual care without prone positioning, did not significantly reduce endotracheal intubation at 30 days. However, the effect size for the primary study outcome was imprecise and does not exclude a clinically important benefit. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04350723.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intubation, IntratrachealProne PositionRespiratory InsufficiencyWakefulnessAdultAgedFemaleHumansHypoxiaMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35569448
PMCPMC9108999
OpenAlexW4280613900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.