Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35569118›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2022

Use of prescription medications with cardiovascular adverse effects among older adults in the United States.

Katharine Ozenberger, G Caleb Alexander, Jung-Im Shin, Eric A Whitsel, Dima M Qato

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine OzenbergerProgram on Medicines and Public Health, Titus Family Department of Clinical Pharmacy, ADD School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
G Caleb AlexanderCenter for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jung-Im ShinCenter for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Eric A WhitselDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Dima M QatoProgram on Medicines and Public Health, Titus Family Department of Clinical Pharmacy, ADD School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Second-line Therapy in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesK01DK121825 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHIN, JUNG-IM · 2019 to 2022
$615k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK121825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany commonly used prescription medications have cardiovascular adverse effects, yet the cumulative risk of cardiovascular events associated with the concurrent use of these medications is unknown. We examined the association between the concurrent use of prescription medications with known risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) ("MACE medications") and the risk of such events among older adults.

methodsA multi-center, population-based study from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study of a cohort of 3669 community-dwelling adults aged 61-86 years with no history of cardiovascular disease who reported the use of at least one medication between September 2006 and August 2013 were followed up until August 2015. Exposure defined as time-varying and time-fixed use of 1, 2 or ≥3 MACE medications with non-MACE medications serving as negative control. Primary outcome was incident MACE defined as coronary artery revascularization, myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, stroke, cardiac arrest, or death.

resultsIn fully adjusted models, there was an increased risk of MACE associated with use of 1, 2, or ≥3 MACE medications (1 MACE: hazards ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.57); 2 MACE: HR 1.89, CI 1.42-2.53; ≥3 MACE: HR 2.22, CI 1.61-3.07) compared to use of non-MACE medications. These associations persisted in propensity score-matched analyses and among new users of MACE medications, never users of cardiovascular medications and subgroups of participants with increased risk of MACE. There was no association between the number of non-MACE medications used and MACE. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this community-based cohort of older adults with no prior cardiovascular disease, the use of MACE medications was independently and consistently associated with an increased risk of such events in a dose-response fashion.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMyocardial InfarctionStrokeAgedCohort StudiesHumansPrescriptionsProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsUnited Statesadverse effectsmajor adverse cardiovascular eventspolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID35569118
PMCPMC9545984
OpenAlexW4280539454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.