Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35569079›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2022

Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

James W F Catto, Pramit Khetrapal, Federico Ricciardi, Gareth Ambler, Norman R Williams, Tarek Al-Hammouri, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Ramesh Thurairaja, Rajesh Nair, Andrew Feber and 21 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03049410 (A Phase III Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 161 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
62.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03049410 nacompletednot on this map

A Phase III Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion With Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) in Patients With Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2017 to 2021Enrolled339ConditionsBladder CancerArmsIntracorporeal Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy, Open Radical Cystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 306 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results From the Phase IIb SunRISe-1 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Phase II Trial of Risk-Enabled Therapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (RETAIN 1).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

James W F CattoDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Pramit KhetrapalDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Federico RicciardiOwlstone Medical, Cambridge, England.
Gareth AmblerDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England.
Norman R WilliamsSurgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Tarek Al-HammouriDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Muhammad Shamim KhanDepartment of Urology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.
Ramesh ThurairajaDepartment of Urology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.
Rajesh NairDepartment of Urology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.
Andrew FeberDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Simon DixonHealth Economics and Decision Science, NIHR Research Design Service Yorkshire and the Humber, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Senthil NathanDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Tim BriggsDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Ashwin SridharDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
Imran AhmadQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
Jaimin BhattQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
Philip CharlesworthThe Harold Hopkins Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, England.
Christopher BlickThe Harold Hopkins Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, England.
Marcus G CumberbatchDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Syed A HussainDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Sanjeev KotwalPyrah Department of Urology, St James University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England.
Anthony KoupparisDepartment of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England.
John McGrathDepartment of Urology, Royal Devon University Hospitals Foundation Trust and University of Exeter, Exeter, England.
Aidan P NoonDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England.
Edward RoweDepartment of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, England.
Vishwanath HanchanaleRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, England.
Daryl HaganDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England.
Chris Brew-GravesDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England.
John D KellyDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England.
iROC Study Team
University College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBRoyal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBOwlstone Medical (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is being performed with increasing frequency, but it is unclear whether total intracorporeal surgery improves recovery compared with open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Objectives: To compare recovery and morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction vs open radical cystectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial of patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer recruited at 9 sites in the UK, from March 2017-March 2020. Follow-up was conducted at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months, with final follow-up on September 23, 2021. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction (n = 169) or open radical cystectomy (n = 169). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery. There were 20 secondary outcomes, including complications, quality of life, disability, stamina, activity levels, and survival. Analyses were adjusted for the type of diversion and center. Results: Among 338 randomized participants, 317 underwent radical cystectomy (mean age, 69 years; 67 women [21%]; 107 [34%] received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 282 [89%] underwent ileal conduit reconstruction); the primary outcome was analyzed in 305 (96%). The median number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery was 82 (IQR, 76-84) for patients undergoing robotic surgery vs 80 (IQR, 72-83) for open surgery (adjusted difference, 2.2 days [95% CI, 0.50-3.85]; P = .01). Thromboembolic complications (1.9% vs 8.3%; difference, -6.5% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.4%]) and wound complications (5.6% vs 16.0%; difference, -11.7% [95% CI, -18.6% to -4.6%]) were less common with robotic surgery than open surgery. Participants undergoing open surgery reported worse quality of life vs robotic surgery at 5 weeks (difference in mean European Quality of Life 5-Dimension, 5-Level instrument scores, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03]; P = .003) and greater disability at 5 weeks (difference in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 scores, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.15-0.73]; P = .003) and at 12 weeks (difference in WHODAS 2.0 scores, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.09-0.68]; P = .01); the differences were not significant after 12 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer recurrence (29/161 [18%] vs 25/156 [16%] after robotic and open surgery, respectively) and overall mortality (23/161 [14.3%] vs 23/156 [14.7%]), respectively) at median follow-up of 18.4 months (IQR, 12.8-21.1). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, treatment with robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy resulted in a statistically significant increase in days alive and out of the hospital over 90 days. However, the clinical importance of these findings remains uncertain. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN13680280; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410.

Indexed as

CystectomyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMorbidityNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35569079
PMCPMC9109000
OpenAlexW4280542446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.