Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35568944›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of local morselized bone grafts and structural iliac bone grafts in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis with posterior-only surgery.

Shuang Xu, Shuai Zhang, Gaoju Wang, Jin Yang, Yueming Song, Qing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shuang XuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Shuai ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 of TaiPing Road, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Gaoju WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 of TaiPing Road, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Jin YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 of TaiPing Road, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Yueming SongDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 646000, Sichuan Province, China. hx_sym@163.com.
Qing WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 of TaiPing Road, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China. wqspine2004@163.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNSichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany surgeons have reported results similar to those of anterior debridement and bone grafting in treating spinal tuberculosis in the lumbar region using only a posterior approach. However, there is still no consensus regarding bone graft methods. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of morselized versus structural iliac bone grafts in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis via one-stage posterior surgery.

methodsA retrospective study was performed with 82 patients with lumbar tuberculosis who had undergone posterior-only debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation between January 2014 and June 2018. Morselized bone grafts were used in 43 patients, whereas structural iliac bone grafts were used in 39 patients. The clinical data and imaging results of the patients were compared between the two groups to evaluate the clinical effects of the two types of grafts.

resultsThe operation time, blood loss and hospital stay values in the morselized bone group were significantly lower than those in the structural iliac bone group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed with respect to erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Cobb angle, or improvement of neurological function between the two groups. The VAS pain scores for low back and leg pain decreased significantly after the operation (p < 0.05). However, postoperatively, the VAS score was higher in the structural iliac bone group than in the morselized bone group, and there was no significant difference at the last follow-up between the two groups (p > 0.05). Bone fusion was achieved in 41 patients (95%) in the morselized bone group and 38 patients (97%) in the structural iliac bone group. There was no significant difference between the fusion rates of the two groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionThe two graft techniques achieved comparable clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal tuberculosis treatment. However, the morselized bone graft was more beneficial in terms of reducing surgical trauma and postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionTuberculosis, SpinalBone TransplantationDebridementHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionPainRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeIliac boneLumbar spinal tuberculosisMorselized bonePosterior approachSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35568944
PMCPMC9107644
OpenAlexW4280489690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.