Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35568690›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2022

AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study.

Judy Wawira Gichoya, Imon Banerjee, Ananth Reddy Bhimireddy, John L Burns, Leo Anthony Celi, Li-Ching Chen, Ramon Correa, Natalie Dullerud, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Shih-Cheng Huang and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 242 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
242citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

242 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Social Identity Theory of Digital Identity.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

182 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Judy Wawira GichoyaDepartment of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: judywawira@emory.edu.
Imon BanerjeeSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Ananth Reddy BhimireddyDepartment of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
John L BurnsSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Leo Anthony CeliInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Li-Ching ChenDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Ramon CorreaSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Natalie DullerudDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marzyeh GhassemiInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shih-Cheng HuangStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Po-Chih KuoDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Matthew P LungrenStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Lyle J PalmerAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Brandon J PriceFlorida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Saptarshi PurkayasthaSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ayis T PyrrosDupage Medical Group, Hinsdale, IL, USA.
Lauren Oakden-RaynerAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Chima OkechukwuDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Laleh Seyyed-KalantariDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hari TrivediDepartment of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ryan WangDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Zachary ZaimanDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Haoran ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

MEDICAL IMAGING AND DATA RESOURCE CENTER (MIDRC) YEAR 375N92020D00021 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN · 2021 to 2025
$16.6M
RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
Deep Learning for Pulmonary Embolism Imaging Decision Support: A Multi-institutional CollaborationR01LM012966 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00008NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020D00021NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies in medical imaging have shown disparate abilities of artificial intelligence (AI) to detect a person's race, yet there is no known correlation for race on medical imaging that would be obvious to human experts when interpreting the images. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the ability of AI to recognise a patient's racial identity from medical images.

methodsUsing private (Emory CXR, Emory Chest CT, Emory Cervical Spine, and Emory Mammogram) and public (MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert, National Lung Cancer Screening Trial, RSNA Pulmonary Embolism CT, and Digital Hand Atlas) datasets, we evaluated, first, performance quantification of deep learning models in detecting race from medical images, including the ability of these models to generalise to external environments and across multiple imaging modalities. Second, we assessed possible confounding of anatomic and phenotypic population features by assessing the ability of these hypothesised confounders to detect race in isolation using regression models, and by re-evaluating the deep learning models by testing them on datasets stratified by these hypothesised confounding variables. Last, by exploring the effect of image corruptions on model performance, we investigated the underlying mechanism by which AI models can recognise race.

findingsIn our study, we show that standard AI deep learning models can be trained to predict race from medical images with high performance across multiple imaging modalities, which was sustained under external validation conditions (x-ray imaging [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) range 0·91-0·99], CT chest imaging [0·87-0·96], and mammography [0·81]). We also showed that this detection is not due to proxies or imaging-related surrogate covariates for race (eg, performance of possible confounders: body-mass index [AUC 0·55], disease distribution [0·61], and breast density [0·61]). Finally, we provide evidence to show that the ability of AI deep learning models persisted over all anatomical regions and frequency spectrums of the images, suggesting the efforts to control this behaviour when it is undesirable will be challenging and demand further study.

interpretationThe results from our study emphasise that the ability of AI deep learning models to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our finding that AI can accurately predict self-reported race, even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images, often when clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging.

fundingNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, MIDRC grant of National Institutes of Health, US National Science Foundation, National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health, and Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35568690
PMCPMC9650160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.