Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35568232›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2022

Forecasting the transmission trends of respiratory infectious diseases with an exposure-risk-based model at the microscopic level.

Ziwei Cui, Ming Cai, Yao Xiao, Zheng Zhu, Mofeng Yang, Gongbo Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ziwei CuiSchool of Intelligent System Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: cuizw3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
Ming CaiSchool of Intelligent System Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: caiming@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Yao XiaoSchool of Intelligent System Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: xiaoyao9@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Zheng ZhuCollege of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Electronic address: zhuzheng89@zju.edu.cn.
Mofeng YangMaryland Transportation Institute, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland at College Park, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: mofeng@umd.edu.
Gongbo ChenGuangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: chengb36@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory infectious diseases (e.g., COVID-19) have brought huge damages to human society, and the accurate prediction of their transmission trends is essential for both the health system and policymakers. Most related studies focus on epidemic trend forecasting at the macroscopic level, which ignores the microscopic social interactions among individuals. Meanwhile, current microscopic models are still not able to sufficiently decipher the individual-based spreading process and lack valid quantitative tests. To tackle these problems, we propose an exposure-risk-based model at the microscopic level, including 4 modules: individual movement, virion-laden droplet movement, individual exposure risk estimation, and prediction of transmission trends. Firstly, the front two modules reproduce the movements of individuals and the droplets of infectors' expiratory activities, respectively. Then, the outputs are fed to the third module to estimate the personal exposure risk. Finally, the number of new cases is predicted in the final module. By predicting the new COVID- 19 cases in the United States, the performances of our model and 4 other existing macroscopic or microscopic models are compared. Specifically, the mean absolute error, root mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error provided by the proposed model are respectively 2454.70, 3170.51, and 3.38% smaller than the minimum results of comparison models. The quantitative results reveal that our model can accurately predict the transmission trends from a microscopic perspective, and it can benefit the further investigation of many microscopic disease transmission factors (e.g., non-walkable areas and facility layouts).

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesEpidemicsForecastingRespiratory Tract InfectionsCOVID-19HumansModels, TheoreticalRisk AssessmentCOVID-19Environmental epidemiologyExposure riskMicroscopic modelPublic healthRespiratory infectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID35568232
PMCPMC9095069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.