ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
Extracting electrophysiological correlates of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using the canonical polyadic decomposition.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-dependent modulations of hemispheric small-world networks in different eye states: resting-state electroencephalogram research.GeroScience · 2026Article
- When Can Brain Connectivity Track the Working Mind? A Large-Scale Benchmark of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Across Cognitive Paradigms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A weighted EEG-fNIRS integration model enhances cortical representation of inter-muscular coordination.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Functional MRI signals exhibit stronger covariation with peripheral autonomic measures as vigilance decreases.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Extracting electrophysiological correlates of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using the canonical polyadic decomposition.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Beta bursts spatiotemporal profiles and their links to hemodynamic responses during movement and rest.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relation between electrophysiology and BOLD-fMRI requires further elucidation. One approach for studying this relation is to find time-frequency features from electrophysiology that explain the variance of BOLD time-series. Convolution of these features with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF) is often required to model neurovascular coupling mechanisms and thus account for time shifts between electrophysiological and BOLD-fMRI data. We propose a framework for extracting the spatial distribution of these time-frequency features while also estimating more flexible, region-specific HRFs. The core component of this method is the decomposition of a tensor containing impulse response functions using the Canonical Polyadic Decomposition. The outputs of this decomposition provide insight into the relation between electrophysiology and BOLD-fMRI and can be used to construct estimates of BOLD time-series. We demonstrated the performance of this method on simulated data while also examining the effects of simulated measurement noise and physiological confounds. Afterwards, we validated our method on publicly available task-based and resting-state EEG-fMRI data. We adjusted our method to accommodate the multisubject nature of these datasets, enabling the investigation of inter-subject variability with regards to EEG-to-BOLD neurovascular coupling mechanisms. We thus also demonstrate how EEG features for modelling the BOLD signal differ across subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.